FRESH

Hacker News

Does a Focus on Royalty Obscure British History?

41 points by pepys

by WillAdams

1 subcomments

by thrance

1 subcomments

More generally, focusing on "Great People" [1] obscures actual history and prevents deeper understanding of what actually moves its cogs.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_man_theory

by captainbland

1 subcomments

I do think that the "big man of history" style narrative has strange effects on the popular perception of things, creating a consensus image of "what a leader should look like". But these stories of great leaders frequently downplay the human costs of their exploits, often rendering their lessers essentially disposable. So our collective historical narrative has a bit of a bias of saying, essentially, "elect someone who would gladly throw you into the fires of combat for personal glory".
This is what a "leader" looks like to many because of that cultural bias.
Of course most people question this narrative strongly today, but I think it has a role in how strong man political figures end up being supported by many despite the obvious risks associated with that.

by billfruit

1 subcomments

Like if your read Macaulay's History of England, he does say very much on the King's and Queens, but he's not heaping praise on them, he is very critical of them, sometimes very entertainingly so.
Most of English history as per Macaulay is of conflict between the King and Parliament, with a good amount of religious discord mixed in, between the major groups like the church of England, Catholics and puritans.

by cratermoon

1 subcomments

Howard Zinn wrote A People's History of the United States as a counter to the usual histories of the US that focus on presidents, statesmen, and robber barons of the Gilded Age. He covers things we mostly don't learn about in school, including the rise of the Labor movement, native Americans, slaves and post-Civil War freedman, and women.

by b00ty4breakfast

1 subcomments

before mass literacy, history books were funded by the folks with all the resources to be read by the future owners of those resources.
And that trend continues because this article is behind a paywall!

by panick21_

0 subcomment

by bcoates

0 subcomment

Can't really get to the thrust of the article due to paywall but almost certainly yes.
If nothing else the 1066 effect is real--as someone with a vague interest in questionably accurate period fiction novels I seem to have osmosed more basics about 4th to 10th century Britain than most anyone who grew up there was taught/retained

by aspenmayer

0 subcomment