- It's been a long time coming. I wonder if the overhead of user space interacting with the kernel api is gonna be noticeable.
>Another big area of Windows that uses kernel-level drivers is anti-cheating engines for games. Microsoft has been speaking with game developers about how to reduce the amount of kernel usage, but it’s a more complicated use case as cheaters often have to purposefully tamper with their machine to disable protections and get cheating engines running.
>“A lot of [game developers] would love to not have to maintain kernel stuff, and they are very interested in how they do that,” Weston says. “We’ve been talking about the requirements there, and I think we’ll have more to say on that in the near future.” Riot Games told me last year that it’s willing to follow potential Windows security changes and “recede from the kernel space.”
I hope it spreads to anti cheats as well.
by steelbrain
2 subcomments
- Excited for this and the anti-cheat systems moving out of the kernel. This should/would make it easier to emulate them on systems like Proton on Linux and thus push the world one step closer to having cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS?) multiplayer gaming. But maybe I'm too optimistic :)
by perching_aix
0 subcomment
- Following this with cautious but sizeable optimism. Great progress has been made in the printer and WiFi driver departments before, if they could actually deliver on this, that'd be ecstatic.
by codeulike
4 subcomments
- Crowdstrike deserved to go bankrupt for this nonsense, they weren't testing properly, and they rolled their crap update out to the whole world without a staged rollout or canary system: https://x.com/cyb3rops/status/1821096079372251203
Just googled their share price and they are 34% higher than they were before the shitstorm they caused.
- I remember old setup wizards on Windows 9x that would commonly advise disabling any antivirus software before proceeding with an installation. Even back then, we knew those programs could break basic functionality like app installations, yet the platform owner never truly intervened.
This whole situation now feels like too little, too late. We currently have a vast market of "security" software built on top of their platform, and everyone is compelled to use it, often due to compliance requirements. Now, Microsoft has to walk on thin ice by restricting these "snake oil" vendors without getting into trouble for anticompetitive behavior by restricting a market on top of their platform that should have never existed in the first place.
by southernplaces7
0 subcomment
- Given my experience with the scammy, spammy, parasitic mess that have been the vast majority of antivirus software providers I've tried here and there, good riddance. Good to see this. Now what to do about the spammy, scammy, parasitic mess that is called Windows 11?
- I installed Avira Free Antivirus for a day around three months ago, just to check something. When I uninstalled it, it left three browser extensions hidden somewhere on my system. I have several browser profiles, several user-data-dirs, and every time I create a new profile or install a new browser like Vivaldi, I get a popup pressuring me grant permission to those extensions.
Fuck these AntiVirus software vendors, they are just as much scum as the baddies are. What once was just Norton, today is everyone.
I'm glad that they're getting less access to the system, even if it's for another reason.
- Thirty years too late, but welcome nevertheless