Yes it requires chopping the genome opening small(er) pieces (than with Nanopore sequencing) and then reconstructing the genome based on a reference (and this has its issues). But Nanopore sequencing is still far from perfect due to its high error rate. Any clinical sequencing is still done using sequencing by synthesis (at which Illumina has gotten very good over the past decade).
Nanopore devices are truly cool, small and comparatively cheap though, and you can compensate for the error rate by just sequence everything multiple times. I’m not too familiar with the economics of this approach though.
With sbs technology you could probably sequence your whole genome 30 times (a normal “coverage”) for below 1000€/$ with a reputable company. I’ve seen 180$, but not sure if I’d trust that.
> Another problem was our flow cell was malfunctioning from the start — only 623 out of 2048 pores were working.
Is this normal for the machine? Is there a better write up somewhere where they didn’t give up immediately after one attempt?
If you're curious about my genome, here are my VCF files https://my.pgp-hms.org/profile/hu81A8CC
If you want to indulge your curiosity some more:
$ rg "20189511" /Users/george/tmp/genome/nebula_roshan_NG1AW8W7PU.mm2.sortdup.bqsr.hc.vcf
3499829:chr13 20189511 rs104894396 C T 252.77 . AC=1;AF=0.500;AN=2;BaseQRankSum=1.54;ClippingRankSum=0.00;DB;DP=25;ExcessHet=3.0103;FS=4.008;MLEAC=1;MLEAF=0.500;MQ=60.00;MQRankSum=0.00;QD=10.11;ReadPosRankSum=0.666;SOR=0.160 GT:AD:DP:GQ:PL 0/1:15,10:25:99:281,0,436
Put that into an LLM or look it up here https://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs104894396 to find out which pathogenic mutation I am heterozygous for.In practice, when my wife and I did carrier screening we didn't do it with Nebula, but carrier screening also confirmed that we had GJB2-related hearing loss genes in common. The embryos of our prospective children were also sequenced so that we could have a child without the condition.
Anyway, if you'd like a test file of a real human to play with, there's mine (from Nebula) for you to take a look at. If you use an LLM you can have some fun looking at this stuff (you can see I'm a man because there are chrY variants in there).
I also used Dante because I wanted to compare the results of their sequencing and variant calling. Unfortunately, they have a different way to tie the sequence back to the user (you take the code they have and keep it safe, nebula has you put the stuff in a labeled container so it's already mapped by them) and I was in a hurry with other stuff. They never responded to me with any assistance on the subject - not even to refuse the request to get the code for that address - so I have no idea how they work.
The nanopore stuff is very cool, but I heard (on Twitter) there were quality control issues with the devices. I'd love to try it some time later just to line it up with my daughter's genome.
OP you'd get better results of you centrifuge your blood, extract the white blood cells and sequence those instead of whole blood. Thats a bit tricky with a lance and a tiny device though...
So, yes, you can sequence your genome relatively cheaply using these technologies at home, but you won't be able to draw any conclusions from the results
It is quite hard to get yourself sequenced in EU in 2025.
k
> 200 µL of blood (about ⅕ of a ml)
"About"? Anyway, thanks for the clarification.