OpenAI probably can't make ends meet. That's where you come in
by ungovernableCat
0 subcomment
- What an amazing financial innovation.
If the government involves itself now it'll actually be much cheaper then if the government involves themselves after they've entangled the entire stock market and financial sector into their bet.
Maybe we can call it the pre-bailout.
They also propose that their services will be so key to some sectors (like pharma) that they'll also seek revenue sharing as part of the companies getting the privilege to use the most cutting edge intelligence. Insane stuff honestly.
All I'm going to say is I'm actually really hoping that China stays competitive in this field. Just like they are delivering EVs for $25k to the world it'd be great for all consumers and companies if they can also deliver 90% of the AI performance for 1/10 of the cost.
by zerolayers
2 subcomments
- Here's an entertaining take that flows with this topic: https://syntheticauth.ai/posts/synthetic-auth-the-power-prob...
by phillipcarter
8 subcomments
- Wouldn't be a gary marcus post without congratulating himself for tweeting something that all but confirms a disaster that hasn't happened yet.
Anyways, OpenAI is not in profit-seeking mode, and there's no economic incentives to do so right now.
by FromOmelas
1 subcomments
- the "If you owe the bank 1M, you have a problem. If you owe the bank 1B, the bank has a problem" adagium scaled up ?
- The buildout is already taxpayer funded: see the big beautiful bill, which seems like it was engineered to make this effectively free.
They can blend leverage, 100% 1st year depreciation with using the hardware itself as a financing asset and dozens more financial engineering steps -
Their actual cost of financing is probably incredibly low already.
I worry that they are thinking of trying to run the company just ahead of debt/lease payments or something, otherwise this is just a distraction
So they want even more?
by _vaporwave_
0 subcomment
- It looks like they might not get the bailout they're hoping for - https://x.com/DavidSacks/status/1986476840207122440
by spaceman_2020
2 subcomments
- Why should we bail out OAI again? It’s hardly sota anymore. Replacing it with a (more) competitive model made by a trillion dollar company with tons of cash is as easy as replacing an API key
- How can I help destroy the company?
- How much more has openAI actually spend on capex vs competitors? I don't find openAI noticably better in any of my use cases but it does feel significantly snappier than others.
- I feel like inferred tokens are a commodity and will be subject to commodity pricing pressure.
Which indicates to me that the value add will come from somewhere else, which would seem to be whales and addicts.
by svenmalvik
1 subcomments
- American tech giants like OpenAI and Nvidia borrow and spend far beyond what they can realistically earn back for decades. Now, short on cash, they’re framing AI as a national security race — warning that without government backing, China will win.
The real play is to socialize their risk while keeping profits private. When markets call this “innovation,” it’s worth remembering: that’s not capitalism working — that’s capture.
- He's defensive but not agitated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEnBCfzsgyE
- Is Google also deep in the hole with Gemini, or is it just OpenAI that can't make ends meet?
- Wait, if I reading the original article (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45830380) correctly, this is not a bailout? It's more that the US government acts as a guarantor for loans from other parties, and only steps in if the debt is defaulted on.
Also this is not a loan for what has already been done so far, this is what will be built out in the future, so the US is getting something in return: huge amounts of infrastructure, most of which would be datacenters, chips, and power. (In an alternate timeline this would be clean power, or at least be built out in Australia, cf https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45836104 -- but sadly this is not that timeline.)
Worst case, when the bubble pops, we get a glut of power and compute which (ideally) should reduce overall electricity and the obscenely bloated cloud bills. However, at the rates that demand is growing, this seems unlikely.
So to rephrase: The real problem is that the infra needed to support the forecasted growth is very expensive, and requires trillions in funding, which gets very expensive to borrow. And so the US government is being asked to provide loan guarantees, because who better to appreciate what interest payments on trillions of debt look like?
by ChrisArchitect
0 subcomment
- Related:
OpenAI asks U.S. for loan guarantees to fund $1T AI expansion
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45830380
- If banks were too big to fail back in '08, it makes total sense that the current AI bubble is also too big to fail, given that it is many multiples of the financial crisis.
Not to mention that it is propping up the stock market. Ain't no way the current admin will allow the biggest financial crisis to unfold on their watch.
by stego-tech
2 subcomments
- Let them fail, and take the overhyped tech economy with them I say. After the utter disaster that were the 9/11 Airline bailouts, the 2008 Bank bailouts, and the COVID bailouts, I am sick and fucking tired of tax dollars supporting rich sociopaths who can’t make rational financial decisions beyond the scope of their personal wealth.
Let. It. Burn.
by zer0tonin
1 subcomments
- Glad I'm not american!
by darth_avocado
5 subcomments
- Absolutely not. Why should taxpayers bail out a company that is actively putting people out of jobs?
by ModernMech
0 subcomment
- sama showed a really bad side of himself in that answer to Brad Gerstner. You can tell Gerstner thought Altman was kidding at first, but when it became apparent he was lashing out, the answer became less about the answer and more about why Sam Altman was so injured by the (very fair) question. Which, if you haven't read TFA or seen it, the question was "How are you going to make money given how much you borrowed" but Sam's answer was essentially "How dare you ask me that question, we're happy to take back your shares if you have a problem with the way things are going". That was my read on it anyway.
Corporate leadership in America has a megalomania problem. Billionaires in general have a megalomania problem. OpenAI specifically, apparently, has a megalomania problem.
- "You" as in Americans. Not me.
- Time to sell shares and buy bonds?
- There is certainly some concern around what is effectively a giant bet but I’m finding Gary’s aggressive doomer takes a little tiresome lately. Just like Sam can’t know for sure that the bet will work, Gary can’t know it won’t. Conviction levels should reflect that
Every startup begins with lots of debt and little revenue and a all in bet that it’ll change. Sam’s company unsurprisingly follow same playbook
by torpfactory
1 subcomments
- I'm just going to copy my comment on a previous post about this topic:
You think that Trump won't demand something in return for this?
I keep telling everyone I know that AI will be enshitified just like every other internet business. Tell me why the incentives will be different this time around. Putting yourself in hock to an aspiring authoritarian is certainly one way to supercharge that process.
What do you think OpenAI's output about Jan 6 will be one year from now if this goes through?
- The China "AI" threat? Xi has warned of a bubble, has shut down the Internet during exam time and is in no hurry at all to push this nonsense.
Perhaps the government should loan OpenAI $1 billion so it can donate to a four times larger ballroom, upon which it will receive $100 billion in public money to fund the TikTok Sora videos.
by cluckindan
0 subcomment
- [flagged]