FRESH

Hacker News

Archiving Git branches as tags

132 points by octavore

by AdieuToLogic

2 subcomments

by ziml77

2 subcomments

Seems like a sensible way to archive branches. It's not like a tag and branch are actually very different anyway, right? A tag is a pointer that always refers to the same commit while a branch is a pointer that follows commits forward. And for something that's archived, you don't need the pointer updating mechanism.

by tonymet

0 subcomment

IMO a cleaner way to do this is with a headless remote, either on disk or “backed up” on a server. `git push —-all` won’t delete refs on the remote, so you don’t have to do any additional work to record or recover them.
`git push —all backup` will record all of your refs and tags
If you are archiving branches in your own rep, prefix with `ar/` so you can grep -v to conceal them.
See also `git notes` to record metadata an against a commit without changing the commit

by derriz

0 subcomment

> Important note: the strange magic requires the official git completion script.
I dislike the official git completion script because it’s so slow when working with large repos. On macOS - because of vagaries of the way its file system works - with large repos it’s effectively unusable. Hint to completion script writers: if your “smart” completion ever takes seconds, it’s worse than useless and far worse than “dumb” filename completion.

by kazinator

3 subcomments

I don't see the point of this. A git branch is already a kind of tag.

How about just

  # rename branch to archive/ prefix to indicate it is archived
  git branch -m foo-branch archive/foo-branch

by PunchyHamster

2 subcomments

How often did you go back to the archived tagches that are older than say, 6 months ? Seems very niche, unless dunno, there are no version tags in the repo.