- The real bottleneck isn’t human review per se, it’s unstructured review. Parallel agents only make sense if each worktree has a tight contract: scoped task, invariant tests, and a diff small enough to audit quickly. Without that, you’re just converting “typing time” into “reading time,” which is usually worse. Tools like this shine when paired with discipline: one hypothesis per agent, automated checks gate merges, and humans arbitrate intent—not correctness.
by eigenvalue
1 subcomments
- I really think git worktrees are a bad approach. You’re better off in my view with one shared state and dealing with conflicts live by dividing tasks ahead of time using beads and letting agents communicate with each other using Agent Mail and file reservations.
I’ve been able to productively run 12+ agents from CC, Codex, Gemini-cli at the same time this way and it works really well.
- There is something you are not explaining (at least I couldn't find it, sorry if you do), but how do you manage apps states? Basically databases?
Most of these agents solutions are focusing on git branches and worktrees, but at least none of them mention databases. How do you handle them? For example, in my projects, this means I would need ten different copies of my database. What about other microservices that are used, like redis, celery, etc? Are you duplicating (10-plicating) all of them?
If this works flawlessly it would be very powerful, but I think it still needs to solve more issues whan just filesystem conflicts.
by scottydelta
2 subcomments
- Congrats on the launch!
Recently I gave Catnip a try and it works very smoothly. It works on web via GitHub workspaces and also has mobile app.
https://github.com/wandb/catnip
How is this different?
- How are people productive using 10 parallel agents? Doesn’t human review time become a bottleneck?
by decadefade
0 subcomment
- I come here for an Apache Superset demo and I get this?! (I'm mostly kidding but man, what a name collision)
by agentifysh
2 subcomments
- Agent orchestration CLI tools are the new Javascript frameworks
by sathish316
1 subcomments
- Nice work! You might also want to look at Vibe Kanban, which supports similar features across multiple projects and multiple coding CLIs - https://www.vibekanban.com/
Superset will be a good alternative for someone who is using only ClaudeCode or CLIs. But for someone using Cursor, How does this differ from Cursor’s Agents UI, which supports local background agents using Git worktrees?
- I can see lots of tools explode around CC, but majority still use Cursor, cursror supports multiple agents, branching, multimodels etc.
It is really hard to justify tools like these, where you need CC+this tool+ some other tools to make it more productive , and you need to deal with billing where cursor gives you access to all models possible + BYOK.
Not trying to be negative ... but why hustle?
- IDK what everyone is doing anymore. Just why do you need 10 parallel agents doing things. How is this even a possible workflow for a person.
- Funny ... I have a 50-line bash script that does this but it also runs each agent in a sandbox so the agents can't write to disk outside their designated got worktree. I'm happy to skip the TS+NodeJS but will admit my version might not be as portable.
- I’ve been a career programmer for almost two decades but have stopped for a while to parent my young kids. Is this what I’m coming back to? Because honestly I hate it.
by theturtletalks
4 subcomments
- I’ve been following this space and a lot of good apps:
Conductor
Chorus
Vibetunnel
VibeKanban
Mux
Happy
AutoClaude
ClaudeSquad
All of these allow you to work on multiple terminals at once. Some support work trees and others don’t. Some work on your phone and others are desktop only.
Superset seems like a great addition!
by nateb2022
1 subcomments
- Noticed this is built with electron (nice job with the project architecture btw, I appreciate the cleanness), any particular reason a Windows build isn't available yet?
- In the past I've worked with devs who complain about the cost of context switching when they're asked to work on more than one thing in a sprint. I have no idea how they'd cope with a tool like this. They'd probably complain a lot and just not bother using it.
by memoriuaysj
3 subcomments
- is there such a tool, which is composable?
I have my own VM's with agents installed inside, is there a tool which supports calling a codex/claude in a particular directory through a particular SSH destination?
Basically BringYourOwnAgentAndSandbox support.
Or which supports plugins so I can give it a small script which hooks it up to my available agents.
by bingemaker
2 subcomments
- I have a question: How do you manage web servers running parallely for 10 coding agents?
by roggenbuck
2 subcomments
- I’ve used superset at work this last week, and it’s great! Excited to see what’s next!
by kridsdale1
1 subcomments
- What if my job uses hg and not git?
- But then you got you merge and PR it. Just have the agents work in the same directory at the same time and have them commit only their changes.
- ah so now you can be a "10x" engineer -- 10x the cost with 0 to show. Where do I sign up?
by hmokiguess
1 subcomments
- I wonder what will be the next git feature we are going to (re)discover and build dozens of shiny glorified user interfaces on top.
- Not to be confused with Apache Superset (data visualization solution)
https://superset.apache.org/
by lesser-shadow
0 subcomment
- [dead]
Hacker News