I'm curious about the decision to do it showing 2 words and you find the 3rd. It's trivial to identify which length and text decoration you're looking for, usually leaving only a couple options and you have to work out which one is the right part of speech. I guess that's why you're meant to level up your pacing.

But I'm surprised it's not more like the original set, where you're searching around the board for a group of 3 rather than presented with 2 that have a known 3rd that you're meant to find.

The share result is really clever. I guess maybe that answers my questions actually, it's designed around a playtime that's more like a daily puzzle game.

Suggestionms:

A version where you actually need to find sets -- "have two, find third" is way too easy.

Monospaced font -- it's too hard visually to see difference in word length right now, w/o counting letters.

I hope nobody in the wagon gets dysentery.

> In Tidy Baby you only have to deal with three dimensions... two “game cards” and a grid of up to nine candidates

So it's just recognizing which candidate completes the set?

> - word length (3, 4, or 5 letters) - part of speech (noun, verb, or adjective) - style (bold, underline, or italic)

"Style" seems artificial here. Couldn't it be something else to do with the word itself?

The blatant rip off of a round from the BBC quiz show Only Connect?