FRESH

Hacker News

Home

Happy 50th Birthday KIM-1

72 points by JKCalhoun

by sizzzzlerz

2 subcomments

In 1978, I was at my first engineering job after getting my BSEE. The company had set up a small lab that had variety of small computers, including a KIM-1. It also had an Apple II, a CROMEMCO computer, and a Pet, plus one or two others. At that time, I was only familiar with big iron, like an IBM 370, that I could only submit jobs to. As a result, I was in heaven. Here were computers that I could interact with directly, write programs (in Basic) for, and play games. I was in there every day at lunch or after work, sometimes staying until 2 or 3 in the morning. I messed around with the KIM a bit but found it unrefined and clunky to use as compared to the Apple or even the Pet.

by jonjacky

0 subcomment

Its low cost and being completely self-contained made the KIM-1 unique among the 6502 computers of the 1970s. It was a small fraction of the cost of an Apple, Pet, Atari etc. which made it practical to build into an embedded controller as if it were just another part.
It did not require an external computer or terminal to use, you could program and run it from the built-in hex keypad. The simple 6502 instruction set did not require an assembler, it was quite practical to write the assembly language program on paper and then hand-assemble it by looking up the hex opcodes -- after a while you remembered the most common ones -- this was actually simpler and faster than dealing with program development tools. It only took a few minutes to key in a couple of hundred bytes, which was sufficient for many control programs -- you were not using the KIM as a personal computer, but as a (much better!) replacement for dozens of TTL chips and IC timers.
You could use it to do real work, build real devices. I built this programmable gas mixer for respiratory physiology experiments:
https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/jappl.1980.4... Programmable Gas Mixer ..., Journal of Applied Physiology 49(1), 1980.

by jgrahamc

1 subcomments

Couple of blogs about my KIM-1:
1. My 1976 KIM-1 https://blog.jgc.org/2023/11/my-1976-kim-1.html
2. Getting the KIM-1 to talk to my Mac https://blog.jgc.org/2025/02/getting-kim-1-to-talk-to-my-mac...

by JKCalhoun

0 subcomment

Other KIM-1 links some may prefer:
http://retro.hansotten.nl/6502-sbc/kim-1-manuals-and-softwar...
https://groups.google.com/g/kim-1

by JKCalhoun

1 subcomments

The first single-board computer I had ever heard of. And I saw it in a book on making your own robot (1970's, TAB books, I think). No way I could afford a $400 computer with my measly allowance. Oh well—I've since been able to build a couple replicas.
The author of the robot book [1] had an unusual last name. When I came across the same last name during my time at Apple, a co-worker, I emailed him and he said that it was in fact his brother that had written the book. Small world, I guess.
[1] https://archive.org/details/howtobuildcomput0000loof

by rickydroll

0 subcomment

A buddy of mine and I bought Kim-1 systems. We did all the usual things, abusing the TTY interface to rs232, overclocking the CPU so it could go faster than 9600 baud, hacking Microsoft basic so it would run on the Kim-1
I wrote an interrupt driven cassette data writer to record data while the foreground was doing something else.
The project was to strap a Kim-1 and a cassette recorder to the chest of a skydiver and record their cardiac data after they jumped out of the plane. We wanted to be able to preserve as much of the data as possible should the skydiver go splat. Kind of dark but you know, programming is not all unicorns and rainbows.
Then I did boring stuff like running fig-forth, building my own floppy disc controller and forth block disk drivers. You know, the usual Kim-1 stuff

by anonymousiam

0 subcomment

I nearly bought a KIM-1, but opted instead for the Synertek SYM-1, which had some improved features. It was my first real computer. (I already had a HP-41C.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SYM-1

by raphlinus

0 subcomment

I had one of these as a kid, actually on loan from another microcomputer enthusiast. My dad and I had soldered an SDK-85 kit (which I have) and we swapped that for the KIM-1 with another microcomputer enthusiast. It's the machine where I first started to learn programming, in machine code, entered in hex.
There's something really appealing about machines this simple which has been lost in the modern era. But this particular board was very limited, there wasn't a lot you could actually do with it.

by _the_inflator

0 subcomment

The legendary Jim Butterfield needs to be remembered in connection with the KIM.
He wrote the “The First Book of KIM” and it kickstarted his career within the 6502/6510 microprocessor family namely Commodore.
He is such an awesome role model to this day in explaining complex concepts to the average people that made them hungry for more.
Search him on YouTube, you will want to start BASIC on C64 the moment you watch him unpacking a C64 and plugin it in to show how easy it is to write BASIC programs for fun.

by fundatus

0 subcomment

The 8-Bit Guy did a great episode about the history of the Commodore PET and it starts with the KIM-1 and how it was basically turned into the PET. Highly recommended!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP9y_7it3ZM

by deadbabe

2 subcomments

README looks excessively LLM generated

by jgehrcke

1 subcomments

thought this might be about kim dotcom -- is he 50 yet?

by dogman1050

0 subcomment

As a poor engineering student, I couldn't afford one of these, but I could afford the TIM-1 chipset at $35, wire wrapped it up, and borrowed a single-line ascii terminal from a buddy. It's hanging on my lab wall next to other obsolete stuff.

by anthk

0 subcomment

Kim-I emulator and assemler written in T3X/0:
https://t3x.org/t3x/0/sim65kit.html
Calculator:
https://t3x.org/kimuno/kimcalc.html
If you can get microchess and know a little of 6502, you can trivially adapt the ACIA serial code to the I/O of the simulator from T3X.
Also, T3X/0 itself:
https://t3x.org/t3x/0/index.html

by hellel

0 subcomment

[dead]