^^T ?? obj.[:member:] ?? What is this craziness? No way this is the best we could come up with. I'm actually thinking C++ may be going too far (and this is as someone who thinks template metaprogramming is "fine").

Never before has that quote "inside C++ is a smaller, better language trying to get out" been more applicable.

I appreciate that they're solving a lot of corner cases and adding some advanced functionality in the spec but now we've got language text that looks quite a bit like perl. I wonder if it will acquire some of the same properties.

> Reflection in C++26 might be insufficient for replacing moc.

https://wiki.qt.io/C++_reflection_(P2996)_and_moc