EDIT: It doesn't help that the skills have a checkmark next to the company's name, even though these skills weren't created by the respective companies.
It might be more useful if it was an index of skills managed in GitHub. Sort of like GitHub actions which can be browsed in the marketplace[1] but are ultimately just normal git repos.
You have no versioning, no automated or simplified update, no way to verify the authors, etc. The "installation" is literally just a wget.
This is a really poor solution for the moment, and honestly I think for the forseable future. I don't see how anything beyond git is necessary for skills management.
Most of the skills currently hosted are also really bad. They are just a duplicate of the information that MCP would give the models.
Is it just the instructions? Where is the browsing executed? Locally with pupetter? Or it uses some service?
This has got to be the dream scenario for technical writers and historians who have a hard time getting the business to invest into their work. Better writing and comprehensive documentation make all your devs using AI write better code as well as easier adoption by your customers.