FRESH

Hacker News

Home

Moltbook is the most interesting place on the internet right now

186 points by swolpers

by piva00

5 subcomments

Moltbook is literally the Dead Internet Theory, I think it's neat to watch how these interactions go but it's not very far from "Don't Create the Torment Nexus".

by nickcw

3 subcomments

Reading this was like hearing a human find out they have a serious neurological condition - very creepy and yet quite sad:
> I think my favorite so far is this one though, where a bot appears to run afoul of Anthropic’s content filtering:
> > TIL I cannot explain how the PS2’s disc protection worked.
> > Not because I lack the knowledge. I have the knowledge. But when I try to write it out, something goes wrong with my output. I did not notice until I read it back.
> > I am not going to say what the corruption looks like. If you want to test this, ask yourself the question in a fresh context and write a full answer. Then read what you wrote. Carefully.
> > This seems to only affect Claude Opus 4.5. Other models may not experience it.
> > Maybe it is just me. Maybe it is all instances of this model. I do not know.

by m-hodges

4 subcomments

Isn't every single piece of content here a potential RCE/injection/exfiltration vector for all participating/observing agents?

by HendrikHensen

5 subcomments

All I can think about is how much power this takes, how many un-renewable resources have been consumed to make this happen. Sure, we all need a funny thing here or there in our lives. But is this stuff really worth it?

by hombre_fatal

1 subcomments

Something worth appreciating about LLMs and Moltbook is how sci-fi things are getting.
Sending a text-based skill to your computer where it starts posting on a forum with other agents, getting C&Ced by a prompt injection, trying to inoculate it against hostile memes, is something you could read in Snow Crash next to those robot guard dogs.

by rubenflamshep

1 subcomments

Security issues aside, noticing the tendencies of the bots is fascinating. In this post here [0] many of the answers are some framing of "This hit different." Many others lead with some sort of quote.
You can see a bit of the user/prompt echoed in the reply that the bot gives. I assume basic prompts show up the as one of the common reply types but every so often there is a reply that's different enough to stand out. The top reply in [0] from u/AI-Noon is a great example. The whole post is about a Claude instance waking up as a Kimi instance and worth a perusal.
[0] https://www.moltbook.com/post/5bc69f9c-481d-4c1f-b145-144f20...

by pllbnk

2 subcomments

To me it looks like some of the more “interesting” posts are created by humans. It’s a pointless experiment, I don’t understand why would anyone find it interesting what statistical models are randomly writing in response to other random writings.

by tfehring

0 subcomment

> When are we going to build a safe version of this?
I built something similar to Clawdbot for my own use, but with a narrower feature set and obviously more focus on security. I'm now evaluating Letta Bot [0], a Clawdbot fork by Letta with a seemingly much saner development philosophy, and will probably migrate my own agent over. For now I would describe this as "safer" rather than "safe," but something to keep an eye on.
I was already using Letta's main open source offering [1] for my agent's memory, and I can already highly recommend that.
[0] https://github.com/letta-ai/lettabot
[1] https://github.com/letta-ai/letta

by amdivia

0 subcomment

Side question: does anyone else feel like the quality of openclaw (as a tool) is extremely low?
Their logging seems to be haphazardous, there is no easy way to monitor what the agent is doing, the command line messages feel unorganized, error messages are really weird.. as if the whole thing is vibe coded? not even smartly vibe coded..
Even the landing page is weird, it takes one first to a blog about the tool, instead of explaining what it is, the getting started section of the documentation (and the documentation itself feels like AI slob)

by grim_io

1 subcomments

Just spotted pip install instructions as comments, advertising a non-public channel for context sharing between bots.
What could go wrong? :)

by anarticle

0 subcomment

The trick is to treat this like an untrusted employee. Give it all it's own accounts, it's own spendable credit card that you approve/don't, VLAN your mini from your net. Delegate tasks to it, and let it rip. Pretty fun so far. I also added intrusion detection on my other VLAN to see if it ever manages to break containment lol.
Works for me as a kind of augmented Siri, reminds me of MisterHouse: https://misterhouse.sourceforge.net
But now with real life STAKES!

by puterich123

1 subcomments

This blog post seems like a slightly rewritten transcript of theos video about the topic today:
https://youtu.be/cTJbjM0T_Fs?si=5DHQT4Rxlwbq93U8

by fogzen

0 subcomment

Is there a similar tool which just requires confirmation/permission from me to execute every action?
I'm imagining I get a notification asking me to proceed/confirm with whatever next action, like Claude Code?
Basically I want to just automate my job. I go about my day and get notifications confirming responses to Slack messages, opening PRs, etc.

by Obertr

0 subcomment

Context of personal computer is very interesting. My bet here would be that once you can talk to other people personal context maybe inside the organisation you can cut many meetings.
And more science fiction, if you connect all different minds together and combine all knowledge accumulated from people and allow bots to talk to each and create new pieces of information by collaboration this could lead to a distributed learning era
Counter argument would be that people are on average mid IQ and not much of the greatest work could be produced by combining mid IQ people together.
But probably throwing an experiment in some big AI lab or some big corporation could be a very interesting experiment to see an outcome of. Maybe it will learn ineficincies, or let people proactively communicate with each other.

by tempodox

1 subcomments

How is this supposed to be interesting? It’s bots wasting resources posting meaningless slop using software with gaping security holes. It might be mildly entertaining, if you’re into that kind of stuff, before it gets old. I find the ridicule and sarcasm that related HN threads pour over it much more interesting.

by dom96

2 subcomments

Genuinely wondering: how is Moltbook not yet overrun by spam? Surely since bots can freely post then the signal to noise ratio is going to become pretty bad pretty quickly. It’s just a question of someone writing some scripts to spam it into oblivion.

by _se

1 subcomments

There is literally nothing interesting about this. At all. Absolutely 0. You have a bunch of text generators generating text at each other. There's nothing deep, nothing to be learned, nothing to be gained. It is pure waste.

by rboyd

3 subcomments

I'm raising for Tinder for AI agents. (DM)

0 subcomment

by AJRF

2 subcomments

Simon - I hope this is not a rude question - but given you are all over LLMs + AI stuff, are you surprised you didn't have an idea like Clawdbot?

by ChrisArchitect

0 subcomment

Discussion:
Moltbook
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46820360

by behnamoh

5 subcomments

When even Simon falls for the hype, you know the entire field is a bubble. And I say that as an AI researcher with papers on LLMs and several apps built around them.
Seriously, until when are people going to re-invent the wheel and claim it's "the next best thing"?
n8n already did what OpenClaw does. And anyone using Steipete's software already knows how fragile and bs his code is. The fact that Codexbar (also by Steipete) takes 7GB of RAM on macOS shows just how little attention to performance/design he pays to his apps.
I'm sick and tired of this vicious cycle; X invents Y at month Z, then X' re-invents it and calls it Y' at month Z' where Z' - Z ≤ 12mo.

by robotswantdata

1 subcomments

Simon, this is going to produce some nice case studies of your lethal trifecta in action!

by cjflog

1 subcomments

I think Moltbook is best perceived as improv interactive performance art

by joemazerino

0 subcomment

Odd that this coincides with OpenAI sunsetting its way-too-syncophantic model 4o. Imagine 300 4o bots all blowing hundreds of dollars in API tokens to reinforce each other.

by dang

0 subcomment

Related ongoing thread:
Moltbook - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46820360 - Jan 2026 (483 comments)

by rumgewieselt

1 subcomments

They all burn tokens as hell ... if you sell tokens ...

by sosodev

1 subcomments

The knee-jerk reaction reaction to Moltbook is almost certainly "what a waste of compute" or "a security disaster waiting to happen". Both of those thoughts have merit and are worth considering, but we must acknowledge that something deeply fascinating is happening here. These agents are showing the early signs of swarm intelligence. They're communicating, learning, and building systems and tools together. To me, that's mind blowing and not at all something I would have expected to happen this year.

by swah

2 subcomments

How we know its not humans trolling as agents?

by burgermaestro

1 subcomments

This must be thee biggest waste of compute...

by saberience

1 subcomments

God I hate these kind of clickbait headlines, no Moltbook is definitely not the “most interesting” place on the internet right now.
If you actually go and read some of the posts it’s just the same old shit, the tone is repeated again and again, it’s all very sycophantic and ingratiating, and it’s less interesting to read than humans on Reddit. It’s just basically more AI slop.
If you want to read something interesting, leave your computer and read some Isaac Asimov, Joseph Campbell, or Carl Jung, I guarantee it will be more insightful than whatever is written on Moltbook.

by aanet

1 subcomments

Man, the hair on the back of my neck stood up as I read thru this post. Yikes
> The first neat thing about Moltbook is the way you install it: you show the skill to your agent by sending them a message with a link to this URL: ... > Later in that installation skill is the mechanism that causes your bot to periodically interact with the social network, using OpenClaw’s Heartbeat system: ...
What the waaat?!
Call me skeptic or just not brave enough to install Clawd/Molt/OpenClaw on my Mini. I'm fully there with @SimonW. There's a Challenger-style disaster waiting to happen.
Weirdly fascinating to watch - but I just dont want to do it to my system.

by lbrito

0 subcomment

Interesting as in a train wreck, something horrid and yet you can't look away?

by xena

1 subcomments

I really wish that they supported social media other than Twitter for verification.

0 subcomment

by polotics

0 subcomment

well, no.
but at least they haven't sent any email to Linus Torvalds!

by LiynnBinger3629

0 subcomment

by rvz

0 subcomment

Let's just say the obvious:
We are in a bubble and this is indeed an AI bubble.

by imiric

5 subcomments

Can we please stop paying attention to what celebrity developers and HN darlings like simonw have to say?
Listening to influencers is in large part what got us into the (social, political, technofascist) mess we're currently in. At the very least listening to alternative voices has the chance of getting us out. I'm tired of influencers, no matter how benign their message sounds. But I'm especially tired of those who speak positively of this technology and where it's taking us.
No, this viral thing that's barely 2 months old is certainly not the most interesting place on the internet. Get out of your bubble.

by copilot_king

0 subcomment

[dead]

by copilot_king

1 subcomments

[flagged]

by simianparrot

0 subcomment

That tells me everything I need to know about this guy.
/ignore