Why were the ratios not representative of actual homeless demographics? Most homeless people are biological men by an overwhelming majority.

Maybe transgendered people and women seek more help? Or the people conducting this study were biased themselves? As a result, I don’t think the results universally say something about homelessness.

That "responses" is a link to the actual report.

1. The program was 120 people. 80 did an initial survey, 80 did a final survey, and there was an overlap is 60 who did both surveys. The survey was offered to all participants.

So, this is not a random / representative sample.

2. The program also included counseling sessions.

So, there's the potential for different results for money without counseling, or counseling without money.

3. I don't see any comparison to a control group.

For example, it's well known that homelessness is usually transitory. Without a control group, there's nothing to identify what was caused by the program vs being caused by the usual course of things.

Contains significantly more information and exact statistics.

Something that balanced empowering participants and protecting their privacy, while also protecting them from financial abuse.