by chris_marino
0 subcomment
- This news from Heroku does not come as any surprise to the people that were there (as I was). Lots of moving parts and second guessing (that I won't share), but one thing I will say is: Incentives matter.
The seeds of this outcome were planted years ago when sales comp plans changed. When a sales rep can hit their target by simply converting the way an existing customer gets billed, none of them look for new business. Don't need new leads. Don't need to win competitive deals. But finding new customers and losing opportunities are the only things that signal/drive innovation. But from a budgeting perspective, why increase investment in a product that already hits/exceeds their sales targets?
Over time sales targets get met, but the product doesn't advance. By the time all existing customers that can convert have converted, the product is no longer competitive. Like bankruptcy, it comes gradually, then suddenly.
- The original Heroku often gets praised here. Rightfully so. It inspired many. We started our PHP PaaS [0] 13 years, ago. Most of the others from that area are long gone. PagodaBox, ClodControl, PhpFog …
[0] https:///www.fortrabbit.com
- The downfall of Heroku should be studied, they had lightning in a bottle and blew it.
Salesforce acquired them and just let it die, baffling.
- "We know changes like this can raise questions, and we want to be clear about what this means for customers."
Proceeds to not be clear about what this means for customers.
by windowshopping
1 subcomments
- This literally says nothing - are we supposed to infer that they are putting the product into maintenance mode and will no longer be developing new features for it? This is a masterpiece of corporate nullspeech.
- "transitioning to a sustaining engineering model".
I don't care what anyone says, it takes real talent to come up with lines like this.
- Why don't they just spin off the company or sell it? Heroku is a well-established brand (despite Salesforce's best efforts) and there are still plenty of customers and hobbyists relying on it today. Its value to the parent company is clearly 0. Give it away and let someone else have a run at it. Keep an ownership stake in case someone does manage to turn it around. Literally zero downside in it.
by WildGreenLeave
0 subcomment
- Wow, I have to admit that I have not heard anyone in the past 2 years or so to be on Heroku so it makes sense. I think they handled it quite well knowing that there most likely have been a steady decline of users.
Generally I would avoid promoting myself but in this situation I think it fits the topic. I'm co-founder of a Platform-as-a-Service based in Europe named Ploi Cloud [0]. We focus on web applications working on NodeJS and PHP but would be open to other platforms if people need it. Heroku has always been a source of inspiration to me so if you are looking for an alternative and care about it having a strong European presence please check it out. (We do have a US location too!)
0: https://ploi.cloud
by prodigycorp
0 subcomment
- This may be the worst piece of corporate communication that I've ever seen.
- Back in the day, Heroku, Stripe, and GitHub were iconic engineering organizations. They had this culture rooted in Unix ethos with a sprinkle of modern minimalism and style that was outstanding. You could really see people give a damn in the careful design and polish of their APIs, docs, primitives, and overall output.
Now Heroku and GitHub have been gutted in spirit by their acquirers, which is such a damn shame for our field. We still have Stripe and Apple to some extent, and maybe some new places, but I personally feel a real sense of loss from Heroku and GitHub exiting their status as places you could admire.
by pelagicAustral
0 subcomment
- I used to be a fan of Heroku when I started working web apps... The deployments were so easy, but I became numb to the actual task of dealing with the complexities of a deployment, when they killed the free tier I struggled for a while... I work with Rails, and I used to bitch a lot about how hard it was to deploy an app, but in retrospective I kind of thank Salesforce for murdering their own product.
Now I deploy at my leisure with stuff like Dokku, or Kamal, directly on a 5 bucks VM on a fresh Linux box in 10 minutes flat. I wrote a nice web app that wraps around Dokku and manage the stack much in the same way I did before with Heroku... I'm much happier and I learned a ton on the way.
by jihadjihad
1 subcomments
- Heroku (YC W08) was acquired by Salesforce all the way back in 2010 [0], a little over 15 years ago. A lot of people forget that, and assume the acquisition was somewhat recent.
Pretty illuminating reading the thread from 2010, it was big news at the time.
0: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1982489
by BillinghamJ
2 subcomments
- Seems strange not to just... say nothing and merely remove any mentions of an enterprise offering from the website.
All this blog post can do is make people nervous and lead to customers moving elsewhere. Revenue will drop, and further compound their desire to not invest in the platform. What's the benefit/upside in publishing such an article?
- Watching their public roadmap to see what happens. Right now, it looks about the same as it has for a while: useful new features and expected maintenance, moving along at a reasonable if not blistering clip.
https://github.com/orgs/heroku/projects/130
by davidhariri
1 subcomments
- Railway is the spiritual successor. Fly is great too. I highly recommend both.
- > Heroku is transitioning to a sustaining engineering model
sustaining == maintanence mode
- This is a sad day. I used heroku for years (in the past).
A few alternatives to consider
- https://render.com/ - this is very close to heroku
- https://coolify.io/ - My personal favorite. It's slightly more involved, but you can run it on any hardware like hetzner and save a boatload.
- As someone that migrated off of Heroku back in 2023 for a monitoring start-up - why were you still on Heroku?!
- so EOL announcement without saying when it will be, but eventually.
we've been loyal heroku customers for over a decade. should have switched off long ago, but as a small team, it was too valuable. such a shame.
by decidertm
1 subcomments
- Disclaimer: Founder of northflank.com here so very clearly biased. But if you’re looking for an alternative, reach out. If not, all good.
Heroku pioneered what a PaaS could be, alongside Cloud Foundry and others, so I’m genuinely sad to see it go down like this.
We built Northflank because we saw enterprises wanting to deploy workloads in their own VPC with Heroku-level simplicity. Over the past 5 years, our mission has been solving the graduation problem where companies outgrow their PaaS and have to eventually migrate.
Northflank runs in your VPC (AWS/GCP/Azure/OCI) with the same git-push experience. We have customers ranging from small startups to governments and public companies who would've otherwise built their own internal developer platform. They either use Northflank as-is in their own cloud or use our API to build their IDP on top of it.
Most common use cases are preview environments and production workloads. Happy to answer questions and throw in some credits if you're evaluating alternatives.
by bobbyiliev
2 subcomments
- I've been using DigitalOcean App Platform for a while now. It's not a 1:1 Heroku replacement, but the git-based deploys, managed DBs, and ability to move to Droplets later without a big migration have worked very well for me.
- > helping organizations build and deploy enterprise-grade AI in a secure and trusted way
> Enterprise Account contracts will no longer be offered to new customers
Seems contradictory or I just don't understand how they do product management.
My opinion: Heroku had its time but then stagnated heavily in keeping up with what was going on around it. With the rise of Container as a Service platforms there now were a multitude of more cost-efficient and flexible alternatives which were comparable to the service Heroku offered.
- For those not as well-versed in corporate PR....Salesforce are going to do just the bare minimum to keep the service going until the revenue dries up (or some > 0 $$ threshold where it just doesn't financially make sense to keep it running).
Pour one out for Heroku as they were truly a revelation back in the day and one of the most magical experiences ever on first run.
by nelsonfigueroa
1 subcomments
- The corporate speak is crazy. I think the update boils down to this sentence:
> Enterprise Account contracts will no longer be offered to new customers
- Title should be updated to "Sunsetting Heroku".
- Sad day. Was such an amazing product and gave a start to so many companies back then.
by singularity2001
2 subcomments
- It's a bit surprising, one would have thought that with the event of accessible coding through agents, such site deployment sites would prosper.
by craigkerstiens
0 subcomment
- It sounds like there were pretty broad layoffs which impacted a lot more than just a focus on enterprise contracts. It wasn't "just" a few enterprise sales people. Engineering may have indeed been the least impacted, but this sounds like biggest round of layoffs to hit Heroku since its inception, not just some right sizing from over hiring.
- I’ve been developing an open source Heroku alternative so we may never again be gouged for nice deployment pipelines.
https://canine.sh
It supports all the quality of life features like opening a shell via a cli, which I found was one of my favorite parts of Heroku (canine run —myproject /bin/bash)
Been fortunate enough to get a sponsorship from the Portainer folks, which allows me to maintain and develop full time!
- Just about to set up a new app to deploy to Heroku, but this does not seem promising. Render seems like the next logical move, but curious where others are looking for alternatives.
- Not at all surprising, but a real shame. Nothing that I know of has come close to the ease of the "Deploy to Heroku" button.
by hakanensari
0 subcomment
- So they are going into maintenance mode?
by uxcolumbo
3 subcomments
- What are some good alternatives?
Anyone any experience with https://sevalla.com/ ?
- It really surprises me there isn’t a modern heroku alternative that supports the same.. things.
Like build pipelines, routing included, multiple worker types.
AWS is way less batteries included. And none of the competitors seems to offer the same kind of service, last time I looked.
- I wonder how much money Salesforce would need to sell what's left of Heroku to a better steward.
- Is this just a fancy way of saying it's going into maintenance mode? "[...]a sustaining engineering model focused on stability, security, reliability, and support" really seems like a default state for any functioning service that doesn't require an announcement.
by ChrisArchitect
0 subcomment
- One wonders about the damage caused by putting this vague mess of a post out vs not.
Also feel like many are still trying to recreate the Heroku experience all these years laters tbh
- I just got some Heroku socks like two months ago at an event, they must've killed it at the start of the year. Weird.
- Just please don't sunset Heroku Connect
by realusername
1 subcomments
- This blog post is peak comedy. Heroku is half abandoned, I expected the post to be something like "we're sunsetting Heroku" before clicking and what we get instead is about AI.
by mixtureoftakes
0 subcomment
- i am impressed. no ai can ever write announements this bad
- They will still raise prices when renewal time comes around.
by kristapsmors
0 subcomment
- chatgpt translation: Heroku isn’t shutting down, but they’re basically done building new stuff.
For those who want to move and potentially save $ in process, here is a nice cost comparison: https://infraslash.com/costs/
- This is such a weird press release that totally obscures what it's trying to say. Just use clear and concise language and treat your customers like adults.
- slopification is the new enshittification
by dainiusse
1 subcomments
- Was this written by llm?
by andrewstuart
0 subcomment
- >> “ we want to be clear about what this means for customers.”
Nope, not clear.
This is a clear message “ the heroku product is cancelled but will not be shut down, will continue to operate exactly as before but no new features will be added.”
by baggy_trough
0 subcomment
- It's nice that they would admit this, but it seems a little strange that they would. Why not just never add new features and let people figure it out on their own? A big statement like this seems more like implicitly killing the platform, which is what they say they aren't doing.
I guess the best way to interpret this is that they are killing the platform over time but they don't want to kill it right now since money is still coming in and it would make too many customers mad.
by ProfessorZoom
0 subcomment
- more like herok-who?
- [flagged]
- Salesforce is the worst, lol
Hacker News