This isn't accurate as to why programming languages exist. If you want to see english sentences describing the details of code, as working code, just go look at cobol. Machines understand exactly what we tell them, and do exactly what we tell them. The problem is on our side - how do we make sure we are telling them the correct instructions, while giving ourselves syntax that is easy to work with?

Because of that, your entire premise is wrong. Why would I replace working code with English, just to send it through Claude, just to get back... working code? What does that even prove?

You really are just trying to prove that AI can turn pseudocode into code. It can. By all means, go write stuff to test it and prove it, but I don't think anyone questions this. The questions revolve around whether or not those results are secure and stable, not whether it produces working code.

I just skimmed the fully vibe coded page and saw the quote “Machines now speak every human language better than most humans.”. Interesting, and maybe possible if languages never change.