- What probably happened here is depressingly common in early-stage startups. Someone finds an open source tool that does 80% of what they need, forks it, strips the branding, and then ships it. Nobody thinks about the license because the company is in "move fast" mode and there's no process for it yet.
Sure, the Apache 2.0 allows this, but the mistake is that when someone asked "is this based on SimStudio?" the answer was "we built it ourselves" instead of "yes, it's a fork, here's what we added." It went from a fixable attribution oversight to a credibility problem. You can retroactively add a LICENSE file, but can't take the lie back.
by giancarlostoro
11 subcomments
- The project is Apache licensed, so even if they took it, outside of lacking attribution / retaining copyright, I don't see a problem? They would be require to add it to an "About" tab or something.
The project in question is here:
https://github.com/simstudioai/sim
- The thing that strikes me as odd is how is it that Delve becomes an unicorn superstar (by iself), and the company they steal stuff off of, is much much less of a success story.
It would make more sense that the people who actually built the thing would do the thing better and do it first.
by chuckadams
1 subcomments
- In the long list of Delve's misdeeds, this is probably the least of them.
- I had someone steal my MIT open source software (that I sell for $5) and they are selling it for $11 or more. My software is 8+ years old; they are lying to the customers that they have been developing theirs for years. Very frustrating.
mine: https://videohubapp.com/
my GitHub: https://github.com/whyboris/Video-Hub-App
grifter: https://videocliplibrary.com/
- Seems to be encouraged at YC
- Don' think SoC compliance is as automatable as much as investors hoped to. This mistrust and over trust in AI is based on a technology that Google invented and didn't pay much attention to themselves because they knew it isn't as reliable or that useful to the point where its output is so definitely reliable that it requires zero human input.
The coding agents succeeds because apart from wanna be SaaS indie vibe coders, other serious users of AI agents for coding are themselves pretty strong and competent software engineers that won't let slip things easily and have years of experience and a taste in what is architecturally correct and what is nonsense and when and how to steer in what direction.
Other fields - if they have to review every output of the LLM such as in finance running totals and such to verify the results of an LLM makes their usage not as much useful.
- The scrubbing of old posts says much
- No shame rewarded as expected in the post-cluely world of contemporary VC.
- Is it a companies fault for extracting value where you didn't see it earlier or is this an argument about Companies taking permissive-licensed code (MIT/Apache), barely improving it, and selling it?
- Delved too greedily and too deep, it sounds like
- With all these shenanigans surrounding Delve it's a good thing I switched to YoureAbsolutelyRight.io.
by SanjayMehta
3 subcomments
- Old news.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47609310
- instead of calling this corporate malfeasance lets call it what it for what it really is:
its Bunch of inexperienced people (kids really) stealing stuff from each other. (Not a proper 'Compliance' company) -The CEO is like 22 years old!!! WTF guys you think this guy knows compliance??? lol
Ie in a fast high pressure environment called Y Combinator where the 'adults' are pressuring and hyping each other's products and stealing open source, AI generating and in general trying to productize every crappy idea they can think of to capture some VC or investor who is too dumb to do proper due diligence in the AI gold-rush and hype train
On top of that engineering is so high pressured and awful these days e.g this video from the kids in silicon valley: https://youtu.be/0tLEszJs7hc?si=OXrJqPg-5PhVGnYT
by rheakapoor
0 subcomment
- [dead]
by HironoOcto
0 subcomment
- [dead]
- [dead]
- [dead]
by kikitaffner
0 subcomment
- a private fork is a huge maintenance liability. good luck when a CVE drops for the upstream repo and you have to scramble to backport the patch to your snowflake version before customers are compromised
by huflungdung
0 subcomment
- [dead]
by vesnanomikai
0 subcomment
- [dead]
by charcircuit
1 subcomments
- Packaging up open source projects and selling them is done all the time is done all the time and is a good business model since you can outsource a lot of the work and bug fixing to people who will do it for free instead of having to pay someone.
- So they added marketing and support on top. Sounds like how you run a business.
by theturtletalks
0 subcomment
- That's one thing I'm loving about AI adoption and everyone vibe coding, the importance of open-source. When I was learning how to code, it blew my mind when I realized proprietary companies were built on the shoulders of great open-source projects. These provide a nice UI/UX and the marketing, but AI coding is making that less and less of a moat.
Hacker News