- Is this article really worth sharing? A speculative headline with no numbers, no estimates, 0 data.
Feels like click bait and HN is submitting to the bait.
- This CNBC article is based on a Wall Street Journal article.
https://archive.ph/mTiIs
OpenAI Misses Key Revenue, User Targets in High-Stakes Sprint Toward IPO
By Berber Jin
The company’s CFO and board have questioned the wisdom of massive data-center spending in the face of slowing growth
- OpenAI had worse models (GPT 5.2 and 5.4) at that time. But now the tables have turned. Would Anthropic face a similar situation since Opus 4.7 falls below expectations?
- Journos love bashing AI, knowing they will be replaced by it within months to a couple of years.
by jaredcwhite
1 subcomments
- "rapidly evolving industry"
That has always been wildly unprofitable…
by illist-ell1s
1 subcomments
- These companies will not be able to keep making large improvements to their models as time goes on. You gotta remember to not be holding the bag when the music stops.
by nullsmack
1 subcomments
- The Dot Com bubble burst and it didn't materially affect anything. Some of the things that failed then even came back later. Buying stuff online ate retail, sadly enough. Some dumb business plans went away, but the core of the commercial web never did. There's an idea, mostly from the anti-AI folks, that AI will magically "go away" once the bubble finally bursts and I hate to burst any more bubbles here but AI isn't going back in the bottle. For better or worse.
by mock-possum
0 subcomment
- God I hope so
- I guess free tokens are over and most providers will move to token based billing soon.
by ChrisArchitect
0 subcomment
- Related:
OpenAI Misses Key Revenue, User Targets in High-Stakes Sprint Toward IPO
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47929510
by ivandenysov
1 subcomments
- This comment is a mandatory mention of Betteridge's law of headlines.
by therobots927
1 subcomments
- So quiet on HN you can hear crickets…
Chirp chirp
- Anyone else think OpenAI and Anthropic should really be one company?