"Cognitive Bias - A systematic error of thinking or rationality in judgment that influence our perception"

That's not a law! It's barely even a useful concept in the form presented here!

Instead of being a useful collection of rules a UI designer/dev can apply, this just feels like the author picked some terms, looked up their definition in the dictionary, and threw it all together so he could sell posters.

Me not being a "traditional or natural" designer, I like to have a set of best practises recipes or laws. These laws might be difficult to constantly hold in your head. I think this is a PERFECT starting point for AI to "bulk check" some screens.

Honestly I would map it to a short-cut, like I map "format source code" to a shortcut. If you building business software a set of laws or (shortcut mapped to them) can be really useful as a sanity check.

In fact I just did that:

- Downloaded the UX Laws as a screenshot

- Downloaded a screenshot of a dashboard (a userform might have worked better)

- Asked ChatGPT and Claude to do a review with those laws in mind and then to create a new mockup based on those recommendations

Project 1: CMMS Dashboard For Maintenance (fast food chain)

- Dashboard old: https://imgur.com/a/R3wrMpr

- Dashboard new (Claude): https://imgur.com/a/cYq4gE8

Project 2: https://swellslots.com (Surf Forecast App, arcade look and feel)

- Forecast old: https://imgur.com/a/W3daZrP

- Forecast new: https://imgur.com/a/kNi2Nvg

However, per item #2:

> Choice Overload

> The tendency for people to get overwhelmed when they are presented with a large number of options, often used interchangeably with the term paradox of choice.

There's 30 "laws" which are all text-based content buried under 30 irrelevant pictures that up half the visual space on the page.

It looks pretty, but it isn't an effective way to study these.

Present information in a linear flow rather than a tree where users are forced to open every box.

Don't present opinions as facts.

... except for the anorectic vertical Return keys on Apple keyboards with any European layout: which is a 1×1 key with a small vertical sliver. Japanese "JIS" keyboard layout also has a vertical Return key, and Apple made that properly sized, however.

Slightly off-topic, but are there any resources for common UI designs/patterns especially for mobile/webapps? e.g. hamburger menus, toast notifications, etc. I've been looking for a site that's organized, comprehensive and with visual examples.

“Productivity soars when a computer and its users interact at a pace (<400ms)”

This is why I strongly prefer smaller models for programming.[0] They're fast enough that the activity stays real-time.

It also forces you do to split the work into smaller chunks and verify it continuously. So you stay active and engaged, and your mental model never gets out of sync.

---

[0] I once gave three simple code changes to a big model and a small model. They both completed the tasks successfully. The big model took 3 times longer and cost 10 times as much.

In that moment I switched my definition of Best Model from "tops the benchies" to "the smallest, fastest, cheapest one that can reliably do the actual job."

"

I liked interfaces designed by autistic geniuses for other autistic geniuses, they were intuitive and consistent to high IQ people, people who think quickly and structured and hierarchically and of more than one thing at a time, and not design for mediocre people who think slowly and flat and jumbled and painfully and only ever want one choice, the most popular one.

I like designs that acknowledge difference and are configurable. I come from a different culture than designers, and I'm really not interested in them or what they have to say, and I'm not offended that they are not interested in me or my interests. I just don't see why they get what they want but they don't even acknowledge that I might want what I want.

it started with "skinz" for desktop music players: who wants their computer desktop music player to look like an in-dash aftermarket sound system for a car with flourescent segmented displays and many interface compromises for compactness? that does not whip my llama's ass.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yawjaSD__70/hqdefault.jpg

i know i know i give you the urge to downvote me because i don't just say the same things everybody else says because i like diversity of choice.

The poster buying carussel images swipe interactiom breaks zooming on iOS, when the one and only thing you‘d really want to zoom on here would be that poster.

The menu overlay of the shop page is transparent on iOS and thus not readable.

Reader mode not possible on iOS.

All the pages use the dreaded „pop in as you scroll“ effect.

How can someone dare to write the „laws of ux“ when they fail at basic ui/ux from square zero?

Mr. Yablonski, please learn junior level web design before daring to teach others.

Nothing wrong with using Claude Code or Loveable but I am yet to see something truly beautiful and unique from them yet.