- Everytime I read one of these it always boils down to the same thing..Don't solve solved problems. And the best code in this case is code you didn't write as PHP's session handler is battle-tested but every line you write to roll your own is a line you have to secure, maintain, and eventually patch at 2am when someone finds the bug.
Session handling, auth, crypto, password hashing etc - all these are the exact areas where you should be the most allergic to rolling your own. Not because you're not smart enough, but because a simple bug like sanitizing in the wrong place and the failure is catastrophic like in this instance.
Use boring, proven, widely-audited solutions. Save your creativity for the actual problem you're solving.
- Oooooh that's really bad. Wordpress on Cpanel sites is like the Dark Matter of the internet, it's everywhere and you don't see it until something bad happens. Libations for the sysadmins patching & cleaning up this mess.
- What a shame that I no longer have access to my teenage-level conscience, I am sallivating at the idea of going wild with this and the Copy Fail cve.
The potential here to do all kinds of manipulation for search engines / AI tools is enormous. Perhaps the more scary thought is that someone could easily make an agent that would exploit both bugs to wipe out servers.
Good on these companies to publish their findings straight away as I'd imagine that both bugs would have fetched quite a lot on the black market.
- I like how the vulnerability is in the path that (a) attempts to write the password in reversibly encrypted form to disk [0] and (b) has a weird fallback path that writes it in clear text. Sigh.
[0] cPabel seems to be from 1996. We’ve known this is a mistake since before 1996.
by whalesalad
0 subcomment
- > this vulnerability affects - and we cannot stress this enough - all currently supported versions of cPanel & WHM
yikes. https://www.shodan.io/search?query=basic+realm%3D%22cPanel%2...
- I wonder how much of the web still runs on perl. I miss it sometimes.
by immanuwell
0 subcomment
- cPanel being the backbone of the internet's cheap hosting layer was already a monoculture risk waiting to bite us - turns out we didn't have to wait long
by Loudergood
1 subcomments
- That's gonna pair really well with this.
https://copy.fail
by carlosjobim
0 subcomment
- I really feel I have to shill for Fastpanel (www.fastpanel.direct) when it comes to graphical web server UIs.
A couple of years ago I got really sick and tired of cPanel, and started trying all these alternatives. I'm not an Arch Linux SSH freak, I need a GUI. And none of the panels had old school functions like setting up FTP and such.
So good luck to the Estonian (I think?) developers of Fastpanel and good riddance to that bloated slug cPanel.
- Something that is starting to concern me with the flood of cyber chaos in the past couple of months is my homelab. Currently I do not have it set up to be accessible outside the local network and then add it and all my other devices to my tailnet to facilitate remote access (via an exit node on my local network). On top of that TrueNAS doesn't seem to have the best update cadence so I'm worried about having a system with known vulnerabilities only protected by not being accessible remotely in theory.
by ChrisArchitect
0 subcomment
- Earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47967974
- Oh dear.
by caspper69
1 subcomments
- This flurry of activity is certainly going to have people be more apprehensive about unproven software that may be of dubious prominence. My question amid all of this is who else knew about these long-standing vulnerabilities?
- [dead]
- [dead]
by 0xbadcafebee
1 subcomments
- Y'know what would help protect those internet buildings from falling on people? A software building code
Hacker News