- My roots are in Louisiana, and this makes me incredibly sad. It is such a unique place that has no like, and drives all tourism in the state. Where will tourists celebrate Mardi Gras after it's gone? Baton Rouge?
Sadder, still, to know that nothing will be done. No one will be relocated. Just one day a weather event like a hurricane will happen to destroy the area and it will be labeled derelict with no funds to rebuild. People will be left to fend for themselves.
- """
“New Orleans is not going to disappear in 10 years or anything like that, but policymakers really should’ve thought about a relocation plan a century ago,” said Dixon
"""
People have seen this coming for a long time. Here's a classic article about the channelization of the Mississippi by John McPhee from 1987: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20636254
- Rather than relocate, we can make discussion of climate change illegal or just tax the blue states to build a sea wall around the entire city
by comrade1234
6 subcomments
- I would be surprised if the USA is even able to plan far enough ahead to put in a sea barrier/gates in time to protect New York City, similar to London. New Orleans? At least the old town is elevated.
- Miami too. The city is build on porous limestone. No amount of levees, seawalls, or dams will save it.
by 0xDEAFBEAD
0 subcomment
- According to Wikipedia, tourism makes up of 40% of the tax revenue in New Orleans.
That could grow even higher if they think of an interesting and unusual solution for sea level rise.
How about a floating city of some kind? Alternatively, go in the other direction and rebuild the city underwater.
by trunkiedozer
0 subcomment
- It’s already below sea level isn’t it?
- I'm not sure on the math on this one. Google says:
>Global sea levels are currently rising at an accelerating rate, measuring roughly 3.6–4.6 mm per year
so in say 30 years time at the higher figure you have 30*4.6mm = 13.8 cm
The sea is broadly at sea level so it's going to be a job to get the "3-7 metres of sea-level rise"?
by ArchieScrivener
1 subcomments
- I say we wait until 2098 to start relocating so that way we can make a summer tent pole about it and pat ourselves on the back for coming together in the nick of time.
by JojoFatsani
1 subcomments
- NOLA is worth saving.
by endofreach
0 subcomment
- The graham hancocks of the future are gonna go nuts finding out about this mythical new orleans
- Would any of the technology that the dutch have surrounding water control help here? Or is the geography just too complex for it to work?
- I'm almost surprised to see these comments unflagged 8-/
What a disaster in progress in Louisiana.
> Since the 1930s, Louisiana has lost 2,000 sq miles of land to coastal erosion, equivalent to the size of Delaware,
Having been born and raised in the mid-atlantic, I empathize.
If the article is read, while replacing every instance of the word "could", with the words "will not", I think it also states a pretty factual assessment of what will happen...
- A bit OT but what about the Netherlands?
by selimthegrim
0 subcomment
- One of the authors warned me this paper was coming (I live in New Orleans) but he assured me he still has a house with a mortgage here. As the article says, none of us will be alive to see it.
by adi_kurian
1 subcomments
- New Orleans no longer, would be a fucking tragedy.
"America has only three cities: New York, San Francisco, and New Orleans. Everywhere else is Cleveland"
- [dead]
- Finally, Ben Shapiro is going to buy that real estate for a bargain! /s
- [dead]
by onetokeoverthe
0 subcomment
- [dead]
- Weren't the Maldives supposed to be underwater like 15 years ago? Seems like the sea is rising much slower than models predicted?
Hacker News