I was a bit surprised to discover the whole jelly-jello language thing. I’d always assumed when people spoke of nailing jelly to a wall that they were talking about something jam-like, not jello-like. I’ve not done the experiments, but I would assume attempting the former would be much less successful.
by facemelt2
0 subcomment
>How I sped up <important_tech_stack> by 2.8%
>something apolitical, filled with political bot comments
>ShowHN: an ai company you'll never hear of again
>NAILING JELLY TO THE GODDAMN WALL, !%#@ YEA (2005)
>why ai is bad
Keep it up HN <3
by egypturnash
0 subcomment
This page is copyright 2005 by Graeme Cole. What are you allowed to do with it? Pfft. Anything within the realms of common sense, really. I don't want to prescribe rigidly what people can and can't do with it, so I've decided on a benchmark. It's this: you're allowed to do with this page anything you wouldn't mind me doing with your cat. So yes, you can photoshop it for comedy effect, you can copy bits of it for illustrative purposes and so on, but you can't steal it and pass it off as your own.
by FiatLuxDave
0 subcomment
This vaguely reminds me of an old SPAM bouncing experiment:
Meta-study: How many times can you child submit a 'is this cliched saying physically possible?' experiment to a science fair before their teachers realise that they're taking the piss?
by anfractuosity
0 subcomment
Maybe astronauts on the ISS could try a similar experiment ;)
by mrhottakes
0 subcomment
Possible for me? Yes. For others? Not yet.
by
0 subcomment
by cactusplant7374
2 subcomments
Nailing anything to the wall depends on the properties of said thing.
Hacker News