- Probably should just replace their software engineers too. I don't mean to throw shade, but automotive software is so bad I'd bet my life that Claude could do better.
Nevermind that the update cycle seems to be 6-10 months for changes like "You can now reset your radio presets directly from the radio settings menu", while bugs like temperature control resetting to max cool every start-up never get fixed.
- AI is a godsend for automotive coding.
It's really annoying how at some ASIL levels you need 100% code coverage of unit tests. With AI, all you have to do is to get your agent to generate the tests! Likewise with all the MISRA C requirements. Need your cyclomatic complexity to be less than 10? It's just one prompt away! Now your spaghetti code can easily satisfy the safety requirements with much less effort.
by scorpioxy
7 subcomments
- > agent development, model engineering, AI-native workflows -- point directly at where large-enterprise demand is heading.
I don't understand these words. Does "AI-native workflow" mean vibe coding?
I am now seeing a lot of roles asking for "AI-enabled engineers". And I am not sure what that means either. I am sort of afraid to ask because the answer will probably confuse me even more. Maybe it's my understanding of what LLMs are and how they work that makes these words mean very little to me.
- "We laid off engineers to hire engineers with stronger AI skills" is what 2026 sounds like when a company means "we laid off engineers to pay less." The AI wrapper doesn't change the trade, it just makes the wage cut quotable in the press release.
- They couldn't be bothered to train their staff?
by AngryData
2 subcomments
- Best excuse they got to fire well paid and experienced proffessionals that have worked for them for decades and replace them with low paid new hires. But GM isn't in a great spot to be weathering any negative downstream effects. And after seeing how they treat employees for decades ill have zero sympathy for them when things go downhill.
by Loudergood
0 subcomment
- Shameless investor signalling.
- Get a low paid entry level job at a company. Do a good job over many years, or decades. Raises, promotions etc brings your salary up to a decent level. The company can’t have that. They use AI to cut you and start over with another low paid noob.
Man, the only advice I can give people is do not sacrifice time with your loved ones for a company that doesn’t give a shit. Your kid is only going to graduate once. Those family vacations are priceless in the long run. Hell, I take time off to hang out with my dogs now and then. The job can wait.
- GM needs to focus on making better, safer, cheaper cars.
- Can't wait to see the JDs asking for 10 years of LLM experience.
- I would like one vibecoded airbag please
- Unless they plan on scooping up AI researchers, I legitimately don't understand what "stronger AI skills" is even supposed to mean.
- "not all" permanent headcount reductions ...
Tells you everything you need to know.
by nh43215rgb
0 subcomment
- No AI No Life...
- I would say: Great, let them crash and burn. But when (not if) their cars do the same, it will cost a toll of human victims.
by lofaszvanitt
0 subcomment
- Seems like there will be a small elite that wants to go up to a space station and shit on top of all the citizens below :D.
by skywhopper
1 subcomments
- This will never stop being the stupid approach. Destroy morale, lose institutional knowledge, waste months or years getting new folks up to speed, all for skills that could be developed in house and with targeted hiring by a functioning organization.
- Well, the US auto execs visited China and realized that their days are numbered. So why not extract as much profit as possible?
Firing people with institutional knowledge? So what? It's going to improve profits short-term.
Hacker News