- Moving in the right direction, but unfortunately it's still quite a few years before H264 is off patent, globally:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Have_the_patents_for_H.264_M...
At which point, the continued march towards higher resolution and bandwidth video will probably limit their utility
by theandrewbailey
3 subcomments
- > While the US and EU patents around MPEG-4 Part 2 expired in recent years, until today there remained one patent still active in Brazil.
Since MPEG-this Part that is hard to keep straight, this is the MPEG standard backing Xvid and DivX codecs. So let's encode video and torrent like it's 2002!
- Note that MPEG-4 part 2 is H.263/DivX/XviD, not H.264.
- as everyone is saying, this is Xvid, NOT h264. pretty poor reporting by phoronix here
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Have_the_patents_for_H.264_M...
- Good. I have been poking at rcarmo/go-264 but was hesitant to tackle encoding :)
by midnightbobarun
0 subcomment
- Very nice, I hope this means increased support for it in open source projects
- But they sold xvid decoders already for the last 20 years. Every Chinese dvd players could play xvid already. Just not >1 b-frames
- It's so weird to look at the patents list for H.264 and see multiple patents granted after the H.264 specification was released. Was the situation similar for MPEG-4?
by aboardRat4
2 subcomments
- When MPEG-5?
- Too late; software patents in Europe were void so most people grabbed XVID/DIVX encoders from Debian Multimedia. PKF and the like.
And, yes, I remember w32codecs until MPlayer's bundled set superseded them. And mencoder for sure ;)
Hacker News