Simple config -> (Need to do more complicated things) -> Add override levels -> (Need even more flexibility) -> Add a Turing complete language -> (Things get ridiculous, lots of spaghetti code outside of version control. Time for a reset) -> goto "Simple config"

It's fine. I am not saying it's wrong or right. I've gone through the cycle a few times in some projects. On the other hand, think of it as your project is lucky to be used long enough to have these problems. To feel better about it think of it as a spiral. The next "Simple config" is a slightly better version of the first.

I have to ask…why do people want a Turing complete language to configure stuff? I use Sway personally, which is very configurable but for any even remotely complicated logic I shell out to a set of Rust programs.

This is what happens when software is created by too-smart teenagers, that change their mind as fast as they improve at programming, and expect that everyone is spending 12 hours a day configuring their desktop environment while hanging out in ‘ricing’ discords (“what do you mean you have a day job?”)

Worse, if you dare criticize it, the fanboys come out of the woodwork saying you should really just use an LLM to convert to Lua and that you are dumb trying to do it manually. The hubris is untenable.

After 3 or 4 breaking changes over the years, I decided I’d rather use some other desktop environment honestly, until the core team literally grows up. Niri is great, and its author is much more… mature.

It uses KDL (an established document / config language) and slightly extends it to add useful things like being able to include files.

For example, here's mine: https://github.com/nickjj/dotfriedrice/blob/master/.config/n...

What you end up with is a config file that's natural to read with no prior knowledge about anything and if you want to look something specific up, you know it's officially documented and not some home grown pattern someone created. There's a certain amount of comfort and stability you get with a "what you see is what you get" approach.

I never felt like I needed variables, conditions, functions or loops with niri's config.

Seems like hyprland is on C++ so maybe not a direct use case but thought Lua people in general might be interested.

[1] https://github.com/ianm199/omnilua

Thinking I'll wait as long as I can and then just get an LLM to translate current config to lua once the internet has been seeded a bit with examples

I wish we wouldn't keep going back to it. I understand the appeal for some use cases, but pleeeeeeease can we just move on to a new language that fulfills the same use cases but with more typical conventions?

Closest thing I've seen so far is Roto: https://roto.docs.nlnetlabs.nl/en/stable/index.html

Basically everything about this looks great - Rust-style syntax, static type checking, sane type system, easily embedded. The only slightly odd things are that it has built in types for IP addresses, AS numbers, and `filtermap`. But I guess you can just ignore those if you don't need them.

This works for dwm because it compiles in two seconds and has minimal dependencies. I don’t know about hyprland.

https://dwm.suckless.org/customisation/