by brokencipher
1 subcomments
- Coming next:
'Codex and Fable refuse to close backdoors known to intelligence agencies '
- I have a process I wrote that accepts commands on a socket. At one point Claude suggested testing it. I pretty much echoed back what Claude suggested and got blocked. All I could think was a regex matching “test” and “port” and it downgraded me. I switched back to Fable with slight rewording and was able to continue. This was for code running on my box in a Claude project folder where Claude saw me write the code. Anthropic has put zero thought into this.
- I cancelled my Claude personal sub and still use it at work. I tried Codex out cos 5.6 Sol, and when I gave it a security task; instead of downgrading me, it flat out refused to continue.
That left me curious that there might be a security issue that it found. I'm setting up a sandbox so I can use Kimi to see if there was an issue to be found.
by 2001zhaozhao
1 subcomments
- Don't worry, it will also soon start to exploit security issues that Codex and Fable refuse to exploit...
(and if it refuses, the abliterators will fix that "problem" real quick)
by hiccuphippo
0 subcomment
- Similar discussion here
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48979269
by Archit3ch
1 subcomments
- Mixed feelings. Good for the defenders, also good for the attackers.
If Chinese models are distilled from Fable, does it mean that security questions will be answered at most to a level equivalent to the Opus fallback? Meanwhile the ~150 companies with access to Mythos have greater security capabilities. Assuming the Chinese models are not distilling Mythos.
by throwa356262
2 subcomments
- Is David Sacks himself not responsible for creating this mess in the first place?
Hacker News