by freediver
12 subcomments
- 7 years ago we started the 'you are not the product' movement for digital information consumption with Kagi Search. Since then the paradigm shifted from search to agents. Good to see the need for 'you are not the product' still holds up, maybe even more so now: an agent is only worth trusting if it works for you and nobody else. The second an advertiser gets between you and the answer, that's gone. So we're staying on the user-funded side of this. Boring, but it's the whole point.
- If a majority of users switch to ad-powered free tiers, a majority of users will see well-written, targeted advice that is ads (lies!) in disguise.
This is a horrible future to consider.
The more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that a society that bans ads is a healthier, more robust society, and I am not alone.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43595269
- I upvoted this submission, not because I like this, but because I think people need to see this.
If you are looking at upvotes as a measure of support OpenAI: Don’t.
- Those ads are supposed to be "Clearly labeled" and "Separate from answers".
Now, this is the sort of rock-solid commitment to trust and safety that steadily gets worse every year until you go from old Netflix to Poob with ads. But the water's still fine. As a frog, let me tell you, it doesn't feel hot at all.
by sssilver
16 subcomments
- I always thought their top tier offering to their advertiser customers should be "Inconspicuously, over an extended amount of time, subtly respond to the user in a way that nudges them towards purchasing customer's goods and services, without ever directly mentioning anything. Slowly and surely sculpt the person who, through their own volition and thought process, buys what the advertiser needs them to."
The ultimate shareholder value build.
- I was significantly worried about ChatGPT accepting sponsorships—a necessity in the evolving landscape of AI services—but I've since come to understand that advertisements are not simply burdens, they're opportunities to connect with brands that can fulfill my needs. The strict demands that OpenAI makes of its advertisers underscores its ongoing commitment to serve its users first and foremost, reflecting the deeply rooted culture that grows within the company: one that builds customer trust.
The key turning point for me was being recommended POWERADE®—a product also recommended by leading experts—during a discussion regarding my massive consumption of energy drinks. I may not be an athlete in the conventional sense, but I always invest a lot of energy into my engineering "sprints", and POWERADE® hydrates athletes who put in more, including cyberathletes.
Thank you, POWERADE®.
by kamranjon
13 subcomments
- Pretty bold move to release this at the peak of the Open Models vs Proprietary Models debate.
Feels like a really easy decision when it's framed this way.
by sebastiennight
4 subcomments
- This is maybe not extremely on-topic, but when creating an account on their platform, their "Time zone" field is sorted in alphabetical order of CITY NAMES which are listed AFTER the timezone name and are not capitals, which is absolutely wild to me.
If the same engineers worked on this that also worked on the ad deliveries, we're about to get either the best deal per click of the century, or the worst!
Atlantic Standard Time - St Vincent
Central Standard Time - Swift Current
Central Standard Time - Tegucigalpa
Atlantic Time - Thule
Pacific Time - Tijuana
Eastern Time - Toronto
Atlantic Standard Time - Tortola
Pacific Time - Vancouver
Whitehorse Time - Whitehorse
Central Time - Winnipeg
Alaska Time - Yakutat
- I'm confused. This is (publicly stated) the last resort for OpenAI, right?
- Funny how in their front-and-centre example of placing an ad, the user wants to build a fence, ChatGPT responds with instructions on how to build a fence, but the ad suggests a small pre-made privacy panel.
Why make your fake example show a failed ad placement? You could have shown anything!
- I'm quite conscious of being repetitive here, but The Truman Show is relevant again:
> Why don't you let me fix you some of this new Mococoa drink? All-natural cocoa beans from the upper slopes of Mount Nicaragua. No artificial sweeteners. I've tasted other cocoas. This is the best.
- Apropos, from Steven Spielberg's Ready Player One (2018) ...
The shareholders won't be happy.
Sorrento: It's not our job to make them happy.
It's our job to make them money,
but once we launch this little baby, they're gonna flip!
We call this Pure O2.
This is the first of our planned upgrades.
Once we can roll back some of Halliday's ad restrictions,
we estimate we can sell up to
80% of an individual's visual field
before inducing seizures.
- Anyone else run ads? I found the results really poor with little visibility in into what was going on. Also sky high costs. I couldn't see any (?) traffic coming through for my $3 click (wow!) ad so I paused them.
This was a few weeks ago and I didn't have time to dig in, so might try again later this month when I do.
by alex-robbins
0 subcomment
- It seems like "serving advertisements" and "serving intelligence" are antithetical goals. Presumably, the market will recognize that in the long term.
Of course, I make no claims about how far in the long one will need to look to see that play out.
by c0decracker
7 subcomments
- Perhaps that's an unpopular take -- but I actually would like it go even further. I don't mind ads in fact good ones I find quite useful. Since you, my dear ChatGiPiTi know so much about me, just show me stuff that reflects what I value. In fact I wouldn't even mind paying for that. The problem now is less that of discovery and more that of curation, so if it helps me find good things (but "good" for my definition of good which in one context might be cheap and in other solid quality and in third ridiculously ornate for example) -- why not? If they do it anyway why not do it really really really well.
- Nine months ago I suggested an advertising alternative route to monetization - a crypto rollout with pre-mine. [1] What I overlooked was an effective way to onboard. But with the recent news: "Telegram to Launch Native Non-Custodial Gram Wallet for 1B Users" [2] I am thinking the key is to use a chat app. How? Combine AI chat interaction with general chat messaging. Currently "None of these platforms function like traditional messaging tools (such as WhatsApp, Slack, or iMessage) where you can send direct text messages to another person." [3]
Well, obviously that would have to change. I think really nailing a great P2P chat app would be a game changer that keeps things local-first. You should be able to talk to one or more AI models with it. There's still a lot of demand [4] for anonymous chat and that would be a great place to start too. I personally think chat shouldn't even need its own app - it should all take place in the browser.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45663913
[2] https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/telegram-to-launch-native-no...
[3] https://share.gemini.google/lkVcBamQm6ZJ
[4] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48980167
- What’s new here?
OpenAI launched ads nearly 6-months ago.
Here’s the HN thread with 330 comments from then:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46949401
- "Ads were a last resort" is actually the most transparent financial disclosure OpenAI has ever made.
- I've been running ads in ChatGPT for about a month now. From an advertiser perspective performance is closer to social media and than to Google Search ads. Organic ChatGPT traffic comes super engaged and spends a ton of times on the website and does convert. Paid ChatGPT traffic is miles apart, quite disengaged. The platform is bare bones, same goes for reporting. Targeting is a bit of a black box and the results seem to reflect that.
- According to the ads manager UI, unless I'm willing to allow up to $3 a click I'm warned "my bid may be too low to deliver reliably".
Considering I'm paying 20 cents per click elsewhere, this could get real expensive, real fast.
by _override
4 subcomments
- Is there any information available about which customers are going to be served ads? I would personally find it quite strange to be served ads if I'm paying tens or hundreds of USD per month for a ChatGPT subscription.
- Praying that this means the bubble is finally (inevitably) beginning to burst.
- lol they couldn't even go six months after Anthropic's superbowl ad predicting this exact crap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQRu7DdTTVA
by shantnutiwari
0 subcomment
- I had a tell hn sometime ago when I pointed this out: you see ads even on lower paid options. My thinking is: if I have a lower tier- limit my credits, but dont show me ads as I am still paying you. But OpenAi disagreed so I cancelled.
I wonder if we can do that thing that guy did on Facebook a long time ago-- buy an ad showing how much you are being tracked, something like "Hey user X, we know you are based in london, uk and we know you are age range XX etc etc"
by Catloafdev
1 subcomments
- Well that surely isn't a good sign of their financial health.
I would have expected this to happen post-IPO.
- One step closer to Black Mirror's 'Common People'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_People_(Black_Mirror)
by Ethan_Mick
5 subcomments
- I think this is a good moment to bring up a question I was thinking on earlier today.
In a world where agents are searching, building, and signing up for services, how do you advertise your product?
And not just advertise in traditional sense (ads in ChatGPT), but general marketing and awareness of what you're offering. Google search ads? Agents aren't using Google. Launch on Reddit for humans and hope your post gets scraped? Write up a bunch of marketing blog posts and wait for LLMs to ingest your content and have it feed into the next generation of models?
I honestly didn't quite know. If I were to launch a product today, I'd want it to be agent focused. But then how do you tell them about your product? Do these ChatGPT ads get returned if Codex does a web search? Is that good? Bad?
- Makes sense for OpenAI but for ChatGPT it sucks. Now - when ChatGPT thinks it can serve you an ad it will not answer you with the genuine correct option but with the one that is paid.
by skeeter2020
0 subcomment
- ChatGPT ads are sold as being super-well positioned based on the detailed context of the chat session but I have seen very little evidence of this, or perhaps their ad inventory is so small they can't find anything relevant to display for a session. Regardless they are ridiculously expensive, approaching what is charged for NFL broadcasts to huge, captive audiences without providing any of the data needed to assess effectiveness and ROI.
- Well it is pretty good at confirming the right ammunition for a school shooting so that’s one potential market at least.
https://youtu.be/IbG-JGdGniY
(Watch the whole video, it’s remarkable)
What else: the right medication for an overdose? The right fertiliser for an improvised explosive? The possibilities for adverts with that all-important long tail of earned media news coverage are endless.
ETA: in all seriousness… will an LLM decide on which ads to place? And will it be the primary chat LLM (modifying the system prompt) or will it be a summariser (like the title summariser models)
- My ironic humour hopes https://www.roba-kids.com/en/collections/sandpit appears as an advert with them.
by monster_truck
0 subcomment
- Wow look at that, not a single response saying how excited they are to hear about the latest deals on amazon for some garbage they don't need to earn a reset token
by andsoitis
1 subcomments
- Meanwhile, Anthropic has said that Claude will remain ad free: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46884883
- Why would people still use ChatGPT?
It's barely free, not that reliable, not the most trustworthy, and now they are popping ads right on my face.
Either spending a good money on the best one, or using the open source models seem to be the future.
- I'm kind of surprised how bare bones the ad manager is.
by rooftopzen
1 subcomments
- This comment is an ad itself, has been posted every few days, I would guess by OpenAI (shows they have no product)
https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=ads.openai.com
- I just clicked on an ad in ChatGPT mobile app.
As per the press release, it opens up a screen which takes up 90% showing the new site.
It's not a good browsing experience, as it's not a 100% full screen so smaller on an already small phone screen. Couldn't see a 'open in browser' option.
by onaclov2000
1 subcomments
- Ok hear me out, if the cost to advertise is low enough, and you can target an audience of 1, could you basically just make ads for yourself that are not really ads? And it's cheaper than a subscription?
Sorry randomly thinking out loud here
> # Do ads influence the answers ChatGPT gives me? [0]
> No. Ads do not influence ChatGPT’s answers. Ads run on separate systems from our chat model, and advertisers have no ability to shape, rank, or alter ChatGPT’s responses. Ads are separate and clearly labeled.
Interesting... however, given that it's still the advertiser's choice of what "advertiser-provided context hints" [1] I assign to the ad... what's stopping me from putting "lowes, rona, home hardware" in the context hints of my Home Depot ad? If the LLM is talking about my competitors, of course I want my brand copy yelling louder than ChatGPT's waffle-y responses. Rona is most likely to carry that flooring,
but it's best to call ahead, or look up inventory
online first. Can I help with anything else?
------------------
[AD] Home Depot has EVERY KIND OF HARDWOOD FLOORING IMAGINABLE.
See stock now!
Before, I was just trying to get my link above their link on the search results page... but the competitor's ad copy was still there and readable. You're telling me the AI is going to downplay expectations for the competitor for me, and I get to add whatever text I want afterwards?SEO is back, baby.
[0] https://help.openai.com/en/articles/20001047-ads-in-chatgpt#...
[1] https://help.openai.com/en/articles/20001207-ads-in-chatgpt-...
- AI goes full to attention economy. Where is AGI? Where is the better world for everyone? It will be just chat bots trying to waste your time until you notice something is wrong. How is it different from any other big tech last 30 years?
- If a user clicks on one ad, OpenAI makes a tiny bit of money. If a user clicks on 10 ads, OpenAI makes 10x the money.
This incentive is inevitably going to lead to ad supported LLM's not answering questions properly the first time so more ads served.
I am guessing in voice mode they will also have voice ads.
by bunnybomb2
1 subcomments
- Sometimes i get random ads at the bottom of gpt responses that are completely random. like ill be talking about hardware and itll give me an ad for a laptop or wood. i wonder how people will deal with chatgpt possibly wasting budgets
- RIP
by georgeburdell
0 subcomment
- With Chinese models undercutting on price, I feel like they are pretty much forced to do this to reduce the cost to users.
- Puts me in mind of this Black Mirror episode
https://youtu.be/buVDDbjFCBc?si=CVV9POv3m3mVw47u
- Their cookies consent is not clickable on Firefox. What a s*t show. Every single privacy-related promise from OpenAI is theatre.
by noisy_boy
1 subcomments
- Lots of people take LLM feedback as mostly trustworthy because it doesn't _directly_ try to sell you stuff, yet. Once it gets more in your face, the trust average people place in the quality of answers should see some erosion. In terms of the influence the answers have, this should have a much needed sobering effect.
Let the tiger show it's stripes so that we are reminded what it is actually after.
- They heavily boosted the amount of users in the past months (I myself got a business account because they had $1k free credits, and a personal one because of all the resets they give).
Now they are trying to quickly boost revenue with ads.
Next, IPO?
by martin_drapeau
2 subcomments
- I find myself more and more reaserching/brainstorming/shopping for DIY electronic projects with/on ChatGPT instead of googling. Wonder how ads will impact that experience.
by abroadwin
4 subcomments
- I really hope pro subscriptions don't include ads going forward...
- I don't see how this can be any worse than normal ads. Much like how Truman finds his wife Meryl odd with her strange injections of products, the ads will become obnoxious and opaque as well. Another example is how YouTubers often embed their ads into the videos themselves, which routinely gets skipped by users as second nature (check the "most played section" on timeline to see bumps where ads end).
If I ask for deep research on which running shoes to get, it's the comparison of products I'm after. Why is A better than B, etc? I don't see how adds could come into that scope either, unless ChatGPT somehow is lying (which would make me swap to a better non-hallucinating model).
If I ask "who is the most influential Swedish poet" and ChatGPT starts blabbering about some book-company who sells books from that author: okay, maybe I do want to buy it.
So: what's the problem?
- Deeply untrustworthy event.
The profit motive for openAI becomes "attention". (Advert effectiveness is about impressions made to viewers belonging to relevant cohorts, under the presumption the relevant ad will receive more viewer attention, and "perform" better.)
Previously it was "correctness" , I assume.
Their monetization compromises their product.
- Appropriate that I just got my first obvious ad in Gemini last week. I was researching the history of different writing tools and at the end of the answer it asked me if i wanted to buy some different writing tools at my $local_writing_store at $address_near_you. Was kind of taken back by integration of geolocation of my answer. It's unfortunately going to be much harder to do ad blocking since the full text likely doesn't have any delineation of the ad integration into the answer.
- Looks like you're out of tokens. Please drink a verification can.
Ah –– Delicious. What can I help you with today? Would you like me to help you find a new car? I can book a test drive of the new Mercedes C class at Prestige Motors 4pm tomorrow.
- Here we go.
It's one of the 2 endgames of all companies involved in the AI race:
- ADS
- make the users that pay for tokens find a PMF for a product/service and then make the product/service their self
by hamburgererror
0 subcomment
- It's funny how much they just couldn't resist their inextinguishable thirst for money.
- This doesn’t bode well for the future of ChatGPT. Google Ads started out very unobtrusive, and we know what happened since. Let’s see if Anthropic follows suit.
- It is about the time
- Interesting, that was expected to happen at some point.
I didn't see any mention of prices, click rates, conversion rates compared to other type of ads, like search ads.
I assume it's going to be bidding based too?
- Well hopefully we will see the LLMs come up with some epic segues from responses into ads. I foresee a new Reddit channel.
- Even though is just a matter of time for most big tech to add ads, this one was quicker than I thought. It must be certainly very effective (the most effective selling feature ever existed in modern times). The timing was just right also to calm down investors. I guess will be a lot of manipulation happening, (can´t have it all). Verdict, Obligatory move. Expecting drifting from anthropic :)
by electroglyph
0 subcomment
- https://huggingface.co/TheDrummer/Rivermind-12B-v1
by ninjahawk1
1 subcomments
- I always thought they’d add them in as a subtle, “you might want to go here, I hear it’s the talk of the town” way. Without disclosing it, then getting around the advertising laws by claiming it was for the vibes, then be in lawsuits that will be compared to Facebook’s privacy lawsuits.
- "Ads plus AI is sort of uniquely unsettling to me. I kind of think of ads as a last resort for us for a business model." - Sam Altman
- I find this -- standard ads -- preferable to insinuating the same thing in the ChatGPT content itself. Although of course they'll do both.
by adamtaylor_13
0 subcomment
- I don't understand how this will interact with llms.txt files (or if it does/will)
Ideally AI should scrape 400 different competing websites, those that have well-designed llms.txt files based on my query should rise towards the top, no?
I understand this is incredibly oversimplified but something like that should be the goal.
by wartywhoa23
0 subcomment
- But of course everyone believed that this time, this time a corporation would behave differently?
- Being an early adopter to something like this as an advertiser can probably make you a lot of money.
Reminds me back in 2006 when we were running MySpace layout websites and making almost $100,000 a month from Google and Yahoo ads as teenagers.
by BloodyIron
1 subcomments
- As someone who is struggling with SEO for my business due to AI in the last 1-2 years, I'm quite displeased to see this. I'm sure this is going to ruin website SEO even more than it already has been.
- What's the moat? I asked the same question to Google, "What materials do I need to build a fence?" and I get an LLM-generated answer + ads. If I do the same with duckduckgo or Siri I get the answer without the ads.
LLM inference is a commodity. Do people care where it comes from?
by theplumber
0 subcomment
- “ Go beyond keywords with richer context signals”; hint: we know everything about our users
- At least the sponsored posts are currently visibly highlighted. As a user, I would quickly be trained to avoid the first N sponsored suggestions and skip the first non-sponsored suggestion. What's the goal here?
by iammrpayments
0 subcomment
- Can’t wait to dropship my cat lover shirts from China using chatgpt ads.
It’s like 2015 facebook again.
- This sucks and it makes me sad. The end of an era.
I really hope Anthropic doesn't follow, but I assume they will eventually because why wouldn't they? Google and Meta obviously will, with great enthusiasm.
Open models are the only hope, I guess.
- Just in time for the US election season to ramp up. Everyone seems focused on products but what about when the ads are for pushing ideas and ideals?
- Funny how none of their testimonials/case studies state any ROI. I'd guess it's because it isn't too strong at this point.
But it's always been the case that initial bidders overpay for ads.
- For advertisers, did anyone try it? Does it get installs? Cheap or expensive?
- I never thought it would actually come to this, but here we are.
by zaptheimpaler
0 subcomment
- I wonder if this is a response to the dawning realization by all the mega rich AI Lab bagholders that these companies might not be as profitable as they want.
by matheusmoreira
0 subcomment
- God damn it. Local models can't become viable soon enough.
by lifeisstillgood
0 subcomment
- I think at some point we have to give up the “we are creating AGI” and admit it was “a better search engine than Google, we can cash grab their ad revenue”
by sschueller
0 subcomment
- Isn't this "model suicide"? The Chinese models will not be doing this.
- Ouch. OpenAI is giving up. I guess the next step is to be bought by IBM and then sold to Computer Associates.
- Welp, that's one less competitor in the AI race I guess!
by geekymartian
0 subcomment
- "Remember When" is the lowest form of conversation. "Let's sell some Ads" is the lowest form of monetization.
by aiiotnoodle
1 subcomments
- I give it less than a year before the ad is at the top.
- Err would the worlds most dangerous AI model really need advertising?
- We've tried them. So far quite expensive with not much return. This channel might not work as well as search.
- Software Engineers are the most evil group of people in the world. No other tech industry has this much of disregard to people. So many of today's problems are because of evil people in software. Power corrupt people or corrupt people seek power?
- Not available in Spain yet.
- How long until purchasing from an AI ad gives you token credits I wonder.
- Adblocker for chatgpt in 3, 2, 1...
- So guess OpenAI is unable to run millions of agents and take over the world.
And ads it is
Best not buy the IPO shares I think
by nothrowaways
0 subcomment
- I don't mind it if they bring me a top-notch model for free
- This will definitely not break the model's impartiality at all!
- And the chat results will not be influenced by advertisers (right!)
by freetinker
1 subcomments
- And so begins the enshittification.
I hope my comment ages like unpasteurized milk on a hot summer day, but I’m afraid it will age like an sp3 hybridized allotrope of carbon.
by bunnybomb2
0 subcomment
- Who would use a chatgpt ad blocking chrome extension if i made one?
by weedfroglozenge
0 subcomment
- Honestly? About time.
This will help subsidise the cost of tokens leading to a cheaper experience for me (a consumer). Adblockers will come out for those in the know, and ChatGPT are not blending the advertisements WITH the answers.
Anybody getting angry by this clearly has never been in business because this is just par for the course.
by lardosaurusrex
0 subcomment
- They must be desperate for funds if they're willing to blatantly advertise products when so many other -- far more open and not to mention 'free'/cheaper -- options exist now because I can't see this ending very well for them.
That said a lot of the heavy AI users I've met seem to consume massive amounts of ads and allow said ads to influence them already despite their insistance to the contrary. I'm not going to claim that I am immune to propaganda here and act like I'm somehow above falling for it as well, but...
... well, there have been times where those people have quite literally parroted all the claims an ad made about a particular product word-for-word and then proceed to fight me to the death over whether or not they're quoting said aforementioned ad despite the fact that they keep regurgitating the made-up words (for this example lets say 'scrubbing bubbles') that aren't /actually/ a thing.
So who knows; maybe it'll work... but uh I can't say I know anyone that uses chatgpt anymore lmfao.
- Welp, back to enshitification as much as possible.
by theplumber
0 subcomment
- It’s funny that the link got blocked by my Adblock already
- their competition is not google.
but amazon. anything that has to do with buying has mostly been captured by amazon.
but will see what the future holds.
- I feel like I've seen this movie.
by projectileboy
0 subcomment
- It is impossible to overstate how utterly horrible and dystopian this is. I have not been one to reject AI, but they seem hell-bent on driving me to that conclusion.
by IAmGraydon
0 subcomment
- If the output of an LLM can be influenced by the highest bidders, it’s no longer useful to me.
by fagnerbrack
0 subcomment
- Black Mirror, Black Mirror, just watch
by lelanthran
0 subcomment
- Turns out, attention is all you need.
- Local or you are the product (unless you are insane enough to pay api rates)
- I actually love Instagram ads. It's often cool stuff I'd never seen before: airshow tickets, weird manga, tabletop miniatures. I've spent perhaps $1000.
If Chatgpt can make ads that are as good as Instagram's then it would take some of the sting out.
by andrewdubinsky
0 subcomment
- This is so dumb it's hard to grasp. The market is wide open for a consumer first model. Maybe Apple will step into the breach.
Will you trust OpenAI to provide information contradictory to advertisers about drug side effects?
Will you trust OpenAI to explain your rights when dealing with insurance companies?
I could think of more examples, but imagine when Amazon gets a hold of this. Ads are just a terrible bad terrible idea.
- "Consumers are increasingly turning to platforms like ChatGPT to research and make decisions because traditional searches have been ruined by advertising, so it’s important that we show up to ruin those moments as well"
by MetaMalone
0 subcomment
- Yeah, that ought to boost the IPO.
- Imagine giving birth to alien intelligence and the best thing you can think to do with it is advertise for laundry detergent and try to displace workers.
We have put the least imaginative people alive in charge of the world.
by mock-possum
0 subcomment
- Glad I made the right decision divesting from ChatGPT + OpenAI.
by zabriel_goss
0 subcomment
- It begins.
by cayley_graph
0 subcomment
- This is already detestable given how much they're charging, but how long before LLM ads become difficult to distinguish from the main output? Remember how Google ads started out? And for all their faults, Google _after_ 20 years of maximizing-shareholder-value disease is a far more trustworthy company than OpenAI _today_. How long do you trust the ethical instincts of the OpenAI leadership to leave money on the table?
- I will not give them permission to store data about me, personally.
So how can they target me specifically?
Unless of course they do not honor the agreement...
For me it's also not a problem. An ad is easily spottable, because an ad tries to make you buy something.
I still find it funny. Looks like one of the last straws to pull...
- Slippery slope ...
by aucisson_masque
0 subcomment
- How long until advertisement impacts chatgpt answer, I mean not just adding a sponsored link at the end but changing it's answer.
We've seen it with Google, money is too hard to resist. Enshitification is coming !
Thanks god for the open Chinese models, they are the future. All hail the CCP.
by taikahessu
0 subcomment
- Aaaand... it's not available in your country. Only available in: Australia, Canada, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States.
Which accounts to approximately 8.02% of the global population. Or 37.9% of world nominal GDP. Based on ChatGPT.
by sergiotapia
0 subcomment
- Isn't this going to materially impact the quality of the AI response if it has to take into account paid advertising? :(
by SepiaSapient
1 subcomments
- I have the sneaking suspicion that OpenAI isn't prepared / interested to give a careful look into ad campaigns. Any bets on fucked up ads taking advantage of the convo context? I'm thinking:
- financial anxiety + kelshi
- random cooking question + galaxy gas
- suicidal thoughts + shotgun
- Model steering?
- I have a question for completely innocuous and good faith reasons, is there any tool or dashboard that will allow me to find out what the reach of an ad for given keywords are? Like Google's Keyword Planner?
If, as an advertiser, I wanted to know how many people are asking or talking about REFRESHING SODA, can I get an estimate of the potential reach of an ad? Can I filter by gender and age, so I can see how many of gender X and age Y are asking about REFRESHING SODA? Actually forget about the soda, Ok Computer, show me the top 10 topics of conversation among middle age male adults with purchasing power.
The naïve prediction is that advertisers will advertise the product to ChatGPT users. I believe that users will tell ChatGPT about their desires, and advertisers will create products for them.
by doctorpangloss
0 subcomment
- Oh god guys let me make your ads product for you
- ANTHROPIC! Learn from their stupid mistake and never insert ads into your models.
Also, this looks like a last-ditch effort to grab as much as they can before they get crushed by the open models and Anthropic.
by Jackobrien
0 subcomment
- Now you’re the product three times: you pay, they steal your dada, they show you ads. Have to make money somehow
by dijksterhuis
0 subcomment
- Instant Ubik has all the fresh flavor of just-brewed drip coffee. Your husband will say, Christ, Sally, I used to think your coffee was only so-so. But now, wow! Safe when taken as directed.
by epsteingpt
0 subcomment
- "Wait you mean the shareholders expected us to return back the money and also more money on top"?
by shevy-java
0 subcomment
- "relevant ads that fit naturally into the experience"
They took that from Google!
Aka acceptable ads.
Funny how they always drive and thrive on pestering people.
- wut da actual fuq?!
by ReptileMan
0 subcomment
- Just upgraded to their 100$ plans. Time to reconsider.
by ChrisArchitect
0 subcomment
- Not new. At least a month old.
Related from April:
Ads in ChatGPT FAQ
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47716063
- is this news?
by 1970-01-01
1 subcomments
- Mark your calendar. When the next generation asks, you can tell them it was today when the AI enshittification era truly began.
by darkstarsys
0 subcomment
- The enshittification begins.
- is it new?
by Danny_Dan4
0 subcomment
- Well. that's going to cause hilarious results in all those unchecked spam bots & slop sites.
by karmasimida
0 subcomment
- ChatGPT has replaced 90% of Google for me ... that is another 1T source of income for OpenAI
- Cool, so now that open weight models are closing in on SOTA, SOTA enshittifies.
Now for the crash
by patrickdet
0 subcomment
- Here comes the enshittification
by razorbeamz
0 subcomment
- This is the beginning of the end for the bubble.
by petecooper
0 subcomment
- Coming soon: advertise in local event slop posters!
- Next up: upgrade to Pro to disable memory.
by boredatoms
0 subcomment
- Very disappointed openai
by Biologist123
0 subcomment
- Is this a new record for enshittification?
by nikunj1809
0 subcomment
- great
- How unfortunate - I’d rather work with a lesser model than put up with bullshit ads
I finally freed myself from Google using Kagi instead
I don’t currently use OpenAI but if Claude pulls this shit too I’ll have a problem on my hands
by moralestapia
1 subcomments
- >with relevant ads that fit naturally into the experience
Funny, all the ads I've seen so far are so unrelated to my chat query that is laughable.
I thought it was random placement, but if there was supposed to be an effort behind that ... damn, quite an incompetent team.
Edit: And here come the downvotes from the OpenAI bots/lovers.
- Fuck off
- So the ads are going to stay separate from the chat itself... For now ;) then they'll start playing by Google's playbook
by BedVibe_Studios
0 subcomment
- [flagged]
- [dead]
by Unified-Mentor
0 subcomment
- [dead]
- [dead]
by willmadden
0 subcomment
- [flagged]
- The same people that ruined Meta are now the same people at OpenAI are going to place ads there.
This surely is saving the world and benefiting humanity. /s
But almost certainly someone somewhere is building an ad-blocker to rid of the ads. We'll see.
- very cool